Will WhelanACSH/George E. Ehrlich, MD help babies?

"The American Council on Science and Health, Inc. (ACSH) is a consumer
education consortium concerned with issues related to food, nutrition,
chemicals, pharmaceuticals, lifestyle, the environment and health..."
http://www.acsh.org/about/index.html



PREGNANT WOMEN: MDs are senselessly closing birth canals up to 30%...

It's EASY to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30% (!)...
(and you DON'T have to squat)

Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out. BUT - see WARNING,
WARNING, WARNING at the very end of this post...


OPEN LETTER (archived for global access***)


George E. Ehrlich, MD, FACP, MACR, FRCP
International Consultant on Health Care Issues
ACSH Board of Scientific [sic] and Policy
http://www.acsh.org/about/advisors.html
Adjunct Professor of Medicine
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Adjunct Professor of Clinical Medicine
New York University School of Medicine
One Independence Place 1102
241 South Sixth Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106-3731, USA
E-mailed to George via WHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of
Osteoarticular Disorders, Liege, Belgium,
also via: ACSH President Elizabeth M. Whelan, Sc.D., M.P.H.

George,

OBs are slashing vaginas (euphemism "routine episiotomy")
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything possible to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%.

OBs are mechanically pulling (forceps/vacuums) and chemically pushing
(oxytocin/Cytotec) on tiny spines with birth canals senselessly closed up to
30%.
(Sometimes OBs pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal
cords.)

OBs are CAUSING cephalopelvic disproportion and failure to progress then
performing c-sections BEcause of cephalopelvic disproportion and failure to
progress...

Millions and billions of dollars are being wasted as OBs senselessly close
birth canals and commit other obvious crimes.

See Johns Hopkins breast/vagina/penis power! (How America can INSTANTLY save
$200 million per year...)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2108

George, the American Council on Science and Health, Inc. (ACSH) consumer
education consortium should help stop the massive OB birth crimes.

As noted above George, I'm emailing you via ACSH President Elizabeth M.
Whelan, ScD, MPH.

Liz, if George ignores me - and I suspect he will (he's an MD and I'm
calling for an end to massive MD crime)...will YOU (a ScD and MPH) put ACSH
to work helping to stop the massive OB birth crimes?

Thanks in advance...

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


Copied to: Andrew S. Bonci, DC
Kansas City, Missouri



Copied also to: Nick Kowalczyk at the Kansas City Star
(See quote from Bonci story below.)

PS1 George, you wrote in the August 2003 issue of the Journal of
Rheumatology:

"A task force of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research [AHCPR] of
the United States Department of Health and Human Services screened more than
10,000 abstracts, eliminated the majority of these studies and papers, and
still was unable to recommend the best approach even to acute back pain." (J
Rheumatol 2003;30 Suppl 67:26-31)
http://jrheum.com/abstracts/abstracts03/26s.html


I was invited to peer-review the first draft of an AHCPR-sponsored panel
that FOCUSED on acute low back problems. My recollection is that
chiropractic and NSAIDS were recommended as being effective treatments/best
approaches while back surgery and prescription drugs were found severely
wanting.

If this is the AHCPR-sponsored guideline to which you refer (I only have
your abstract) - you should have *explicitly mentioned* the fact that back
surgery and prescription drugs were found severely wanting.

You should also have mentioned that the back surgeons subsequently gutted
AHCPR thereby creating an AMA-influenced entity called AHRQ.

Here is one account from Clifton Gaus, ScD, former administrator of AHCPR...

"As far as enemies go, AHCPR had many among the back surgeons who were more
than miffed by the guideline saying that they cut too often, sometimes
hurting patients, and that 'watchful waiting' was often better than surgery.
That hurt their pocketbooks and professional integrity; no wonder they
wanted AHCPR put out of existence."
http://www.healthaffairs.org/WebExcl...xcl_062503.htm

For further details, see: Sen. Frist, infant penis care, dead babies - and
AHRQ 'in-hospital
safety events'
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2019

George, I was reminded of the back surgeons' gutting of AHCPR when I read in
your abstract that,

"[T]he importance of...scientifically sound studies cannot be
overemphasized...[a]ll the more so as conversion of acute back pain to
chronic back pain is often iatrogenic...so that not only what to do but also
what NOT to do become important public health issues...The general lack of
attention to back pain by governments and organizations probably results
from the fact that it is perceived as a syndromic presentation with myriad
causes rather than as a specific disease entity."
http://jrheum.com/abstracts/abstracts03/26s.html

ARRRGGGHHH! The general lack of attention to back pain by the *US*
government was ENGINEERED - by back surgeons who did not like the result
when science was applied to surgery for acute low back problems!

Andrew S. Bonci, DC writes:

"Presently, the high fees charged by many medical doctors and chiropractors
alike have made it difficult for individuals to benefit from such a simple,
time-honored and effective treatment as chiropractic."
http://www.galilee-chiropractic.net/...s/page0004.htm

The most effective part of chiropractic - PREVENTION - is free!

Back surgeons should not close down government-sponsored scientific efforts
in regard to back pain...

And OBs should not close down birth canals and gruesomely manipulate most
babies' spines...

"Since 2001, Bonci has visited Mexico three times to provide medical
assistance to impoverished people through...a Catholic
mission...Bonci...taught lessons about public health...and refer[red]
patients to local physicians..."
--Nick Kowalcz, The Kansas City Star, Nov. 2, 2002, p. 11
http://www.galileeproject.net/spineh...tarprofile.pdf

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access***)

Andrew S. Bonci, DC
Kansas City, Missouri



Andrew,

MDs in impoverished areas of the world are closing birth canals just like
MDs in wealthy countries.

In some impoverished areas of the world, traditional birth attendants ape
the bizarre MD practice of closing birth canals.

Like tiny persons born to wealthy persons, tiny persons born to impoverished
persons can use the "extra" up to 30% in the birth canal.

In your travels to Mexico, please teach people how easy it is to allow the
birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%.

Keep up the good work!

PS2 PREGNANT WOMEN! It's EASY to open your birth canal the "extra" up to
30%!

Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out! PLEASE talk to your MD
about this NOW...

WARNING
WARNING
WARNING
WARNING: Some MDs will let women "try" side-lying and
other
"alternative" delivery positions - but they will move women back to
semisitting -
close their birth canals (!) at
the very worst possible moment (as the baby is coming out)...

See GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT - my invited poster presentation at a recent
obstetric congress co-sponsored by the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists/ACOG. (NOTE: GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT is on the web: Search
"GASTALDO'S ABSTRACT
Paciornik"...)

As always, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just
academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental
meatgrinder - medical school.

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


***This post will be instantly archived for global access at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2110

Within 24 hours it
will be in the google archive. Search
http://groups.google.com for "Will WhelanACSH/George E. Ehrlich, MD help
babies?"