Correct me if I'm wrong..

Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Hello? Anybody home? There was no precendent set. The case was dismissed
for lack of standing. The plaintiff did NOT bring a 'standing' case to the
SCOTUS, he brought a 'religous seperation' case.



Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Hello? Anybody home? There was no precendent set. The case was dismissed
for lack of standing. The plaintiff did NOT bring a 'standing' case to the
SCOTUS, he brought a 'religous seperation' case.



Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

Hello? Anybody home? There was no precendent set. The case was dismissed
for lack of standing. The plaintiff did NOT bring a 'standing' case to the
SCOTUS, he brought a 'religous seperation' case.



Bob



--

When did we divide into sides?

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women." John Kerry, misandrist Democratic candidate for
President. http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/women/


























[Bob does not advocate any illegal, seditious, or immoral acts. All
posts are for discussion, rhetorical, or humorous purposes only.]

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

See: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinio...ipopinion.html

The syllabus explains the case and the decision. It's case number 02-1624.
The case has nothing to do with the father's access or care. The SC was 8-0
in concurring to reverse the 9th Circus Court decision to overturn the state
trial court with only a couple of prior case interpretation concerns being
addressed about how the decision was crafted.

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

See: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinio...ipopinion.html

The syllabus explains the case and the decision. It's case number 02-1624.
The case has nothing to do with the father's access or care. The SC was 8-0
in concurring to reverse the 9th Circus Court decision to overturn the state
trial court with only a couple of prior case interpretation concerns being
addressed about how the decision was crafted.

"Bob" wrote in message
...
Bob Whiteside wrote:
How will this decision hurt a million children?

By setting a legal precedent that denies their fathers access and care.

See: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinio...ipopinion.html

The syllabus explains the case and the decision. It's case number 02-1624.
The case has nothing to do with the father's access or care. The SC was 8-0
in concurring to reverse the 9th Circus Court decision to overturn the state
trial court with only a couple of prior case interpretation concerns being
addressed about how the decision was crafted.