If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Daughter is 21 months old/Is she too young to be separated from her Mother to give father 50% custody/visitation?
I am a single mother of a 21 month old baby girl.
I am my daughter's primary caregiver and have been a stay at home Mommy since her birth. Recently I have been forced out of my ex's home and he now wants 50% visitation/custody. I have no problem encouraging my child to have her Daddy in her life closely, ...and I am willing to agree to SOME visitation but not 50% for a child that is only 21 months of age. I am in Pennsylvania. I filed for full custody of my daughter. I will willingly agree to visitation and some custody by her father but i do not feel that it is in the best interest of my child to be separated from me 50% of her life just to give her father his equal rights! We, as her parents are our child's voice and her father cannot look past the 50% thing and think of what is best for his child. This does not seem to be working for my daughter. My child is too young to be separated from her Mommy for too long. And I just had my first custody hearing with a Mediator and both lawyers. My lawyer did not fight for me and for the best interest of my child. I do not have much money and I am struggling to pay the rent each month as it is, but my baby girl is my life and I will fight for her and for what is in her best interest always! I am shocked that none of my concerns were brought up or were important to talk about. I am angry ,as my daughter's Mother, I have no say in what i feel is best for her. One of my biggest concerns is that my child is not able to have any consistency in her daily life, and she is not able to stay on her routine schedule now that she is being tossed back and forth, and shared by both parents 50%. She needs structure and consistency in her life so that she will feel safe and secure. She no sooner gets settled into his home and then has to readjust when she comes back to my home to stay for 1 or 2 days. It takes me 1 day just to get my child back to the little girl that i know her to be. She is not my little girl when she returns to me from being away for 3-4 days at a time. She is destructive and throws bad fits, and is starting to hit me now too. It takes the next day until she is back to her sweet self, and this hurts my heart seeing her like this. This is ridiculous, and is not fair to my child. I must find another lawyer that will understand my situation and will want to look out for my daughter's best interest. The hearing was a waste of time, and they did not seem to be interested in how young my daughter was and that I have been her full primary care giver since her birth. My Lawyer promised to fight to get me Sole Custody, and then she said that i would get Primary Care Custody since i was always her full time primary caregiver and stay at home Mommy her whole life, but these things have not happened. What happened and what was the importance at this hearing was giving the father 50% and that was it! I do not see how it is fair for a child to be separated from their mother 50% of their young life. Can anyone help me make sense of this please? I am broken hearted without my baby girl, and being without her 3-4 days at a time is unbearable. She needs her Mommy. I have been the one constant in her life and now she is uprooted between 2 parents and 2 homes and she is now acting out with terrible temper tantrums and throwing things. This is affecting her and the lawyers and mediator do not seem to care about any of these concerns except giving the father 50%! This just is not right! QUESTION- Should the child be older than 21 months, for the baby to be separated 50% from its mother? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"mychynadoll" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... I am a single mother of a 21 month old baby girl. I am my daughter's primary caregiver and have been a stay at home Mommy since her birth. Recently I have been forced out of my ex's home and he now wants 50% visitation/custody. I have no problem encouraging my child to have her Daddy in her life closely, ...and I am willing to agree to SOME visitation but not 50% for a child that is only 21 months of age. I am in Pennsylvania. I filed for full custody of my daughter. I will willingly agree to visitation and some custody by her father but i do not feel that it is in the best interest of my child to be separated from me 50% of her life just to give her father his equal rights! We, as her parents are our child's voice and her father cannot look past the 50% thing and think of what is best for his child. This does not seem to be working for my daughter. My child is too young to be separated from her Mommy for too long. And I just had my first custody hearing with a Mediator and both lawyers. My lawyer did not fight for me and for the best interest of my child. I do not have much money and I am struggling to pay the rent each month as it is, but my baby girl is my life and I will fight for her and for what is in her best interest always! I am shocked that none of my concerns were brought up or were important to talk about. I am angry ,as my daughter's Mother, I have no say in what i feel is best for her. One of my biggest concerns is that my child is not able to have any consistency in her daily life, and she is not able to stay on her routine schedule now that she is being tossed back and forth, and shared by both parents 50%. She needs structure and consistency in her life so that she will feel safe and secure. She no sooner gets settled into his home and then has to readjust when she comes back to my home to stay for 1 or 2 days. It takes me 1 day just to get my child back to the little girl that i know her to be. She is not my little girl when she returns to me from being away for 3-4 days at a time. She is destructive and throws bad fits, and is starting to hit me now too. It takes the next day until she is back to her sweet self, and this hurts my heart seeing her like this. This is ridiculous, and is not fair to my child. I must find another lawyer that will understand my situation and will want to look out for my daughter's best interest. The hearing was a waste of time, and they did not seem to be interested in how young my daughter was and that I have been her full primary care giver since her birth. My Lawyer promised to fight to get me Sole Custody, and then she said that i would get Primary Care Custody since i was always her full time primary caregiver and stay at home Mommy her whole life, but these things have not happened. What happened and what was the importance at this hearing was giving the father 50% and that was it! I do not see how it is fair for a child to be separated from their mother 50% of their young life. Can anyone help me make sense of this please? I am broken hearted without my baby girl, and being without her 3-4 days at a time is unbearable. She needs her Mommy. I have been the one constant in her life and now she is uprooted between 2 parents and 2 homes and she is now acting out with terrible temper tantrums and throwing things. This is affecting her and the lawyers and mediator do not seem to care about any of these concerns except giving the father 50%! This just is not right! QUESTION- Should the child be older than 21 months, for the baby to be separated 50% from its mother? Are you still a full time stay at home mom? Or have you had to find work since your child's father is no longer supporting you? (I assume that is what was happening since you say you were forced out of your ex's home) If you are working, is your child in child care? How would you feel if the courts told you that your child needed to remain in the HOUSE she had become accustomed to, and that you needed to accommodate her need to be in that house? But that you could have a liberal visitation schedule. Wouldn't you be shocked that the court would so easily remove your child from your care? Look at it from her father's point of view: because he went to work and supported both you and his child while you stayed home, he is now supposed to agree to being deprived of a father's place in the day to day activities of his child. He is supposed to become a visitor. Does that sound fair or right? How close together are the 2 of you living right now? A couple of miles? 20 miles? Have you sat down and discussed how to make transitions smooth and easy for your child? Do you act angry with each other when together? Or do you laugh and enjoy your daughter? Your *attitudes* are going to go a lot further in making you child secure than your custody situation. Is there someone close to you that you could discuss this with who could help you work through it? It's a very difficult situation, but your daughter deserves both parents in her life, and the 2 of you need to find a way that works for all of you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The answer is no. In the past, Courts (When determining custody)
recognized a standard that was known as the "tender years" doctrine. Under this standard, a child of tender years" generally, those under the age of eight were automatically awarded to the mother. The only way to prevent this was to prove that the mother was unfit to raise the child(ren). The "best interests of the child" standard has eliminated the tender years doctrine and it is a good thing. I'm not getting too much from the victim role you're playing. You and Mr EX made a decision to split. Did you think everything would be just wonderful for you? I would be VERY interested to know the circumstances surrounding the demise of your marriage. I can't help but see red flags after reading this rather self-serving post of yours. Instead of finding a new lawyer, perhaps you should find a good shrink to talk to |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"mychynadoll" wrote in I am my daughter's primary caregiver and have been a stay at home Mommy Hey Mommy, time to grow up and get a job like the rest of the world! You say you want to fight for your child, start by getting a career and stop living of the backs of other people!!!!!! In just a few short years, that cute little puppy will gorw up and be an ungrateful brat that you will have to support. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"mychynadoll" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... I am a single mother of a 21 month old baby girl. I am my daughter's primary caregiver and have been a stay at home Mommy since her birth. So? Recently I have been forced out of my ex's home and he now wants 50% visitation/custody. As he should have I have no problem encouraging my child to have her Daddy in her life closely, ...and I am willing to agree to SOME visitation but not 50% for a child that is only 21 months of age. Free hint for the clueless, it is not your decision to make, just because you are a mommy does not grant you control I am in Pennsylvania. I filed for full custody of my daughter. Why am I not surprised. I will willingly agree to visitation and some custody by her father but i do not feel that it is in the best interest of my child to be separated from me 50% of her life just to give her father his equal rights! It is not "your" child. The child has two parents. Just because you are a mommy doesn't entitle you to more equal rights than the child's father. We, as her parents are our child's voice and her father cannot look past the 50% thing and think of what is best for his child. This does not seem to be working for my daughter. My child is too young to be separated from her Mommy for too long. So in your view, dad is disposalbe, but you are not......how quaint. And I just had my first custody hearing with a Mediator and both lawyers. My lawyer did not fight for me and for the best interest of my child. He might have, you are probably to selfish to realize it I do not have much money and I am struggling to pay the rent each month as it is, but my baby girl is my life and I will fight for her and for what is in her best interest always! You are not right now. I am shocked that none of my concerns were brought up or were important to talk about. I am angry ,as my daughter's Mother, I have no say in what i feel is best for her. As opposed to the child's father not having any say? One of my biggest concerns is that my child is not able to have any consistency in her daily life, and she is not able to stay on her routine schedule now that she is being tossed back and forth, and shared by both parents 50%. typical mommy control issue. She needs structure and consistency in her life so that she will feel safe and secure. Safety and security has nothing to do with where one spends the night She no sooner gets settled into his home and then has to readjust when she comes back to my home to stay for 1 or 2 days. It takes me 1 day just to get my child back to the little girl that i know her to be. She is not my little girl when she returns to me from being away for 3-4 days at a time. She is destructive and throws bad fits, and is starting to hit me now too. Maybe because you are too controling, like you are displaying here? It takes the next day until she is back to her sweet self, and this hurts my heart seeing her like this. This is ridiculous, and is not fair to my child. Actually it is what is best for the child, you are just too selfish to see it. I must find another lawyer that will understand my situation and will want to look out for my daughter's best interest. The hearing was a waste of time, and they did not seem to be interested in how young my daughter was and that I have been her full primary care giver since her birth. Want some cheese with that whine? My Lawyer promised to fight to get me Sole Custody, and then she said that i would get Primary Care Custody since i was always her full time primary caregiver and stay at home Mommy her whole life, but these things have not happened. What happened and what was the importance at this hearing was giving the father 50% and that was it! Free hint for the clueless......you will not be a stay at home mom any longer, you will need to work to provide your 50% of raising the child. I do not see how it is fair for a child to be separated from their mother 50% of their young life. But it is fair to be separated from the father more than 50%..........how selfish. Can anyone help me make sense of this please? I am broken hearted without my baby girl, and being without her 3-4 days at a time is unbearable. Grow up. She needs her Mommy. She needs her father I have been the one constant in her life and now she is uprooted between 2 parents and 2 homes and she is now acting out with terrible temper tantrums and throwing things. This is affecting her and the lawyers and mediator do not seem to care about any of these concerns except giving the father 50%! This just is not right! In your selfish mind. QUESTION- Should the child be older than 21 months, for the baby to be separated 50% from its mother? NO. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
This post is for all of you that cared enough to respond to my post and
situation in such a polite and understanding way. THANK YOU! If I knew that this site was a crude "head-bashing" site, then I would not have wasted my time here,...sorry! I was searching for positive feedback only. None of you know me as a person or as a mother, nor do you know my full situation to judge me in any way. Honestly, I might have just needed someone to talk to when I wrote my post. I am human too, and I may have been feeling emotional and down at the time. I also, did not fully explain my whole situation in my post for any of you to fully understand and respond to me in a more positive way. I am sorry. I was looking for positive feedback only, not criticism, and crude remarks. May I also ask that you try to respect the feelings of others with the words that you use in responding back to people in your posts. Your remarks and words in response to my post hurt my feelings a great deal. Apologies accepted. Someone asked a few questions, and I will gladly answer. Currently, I am working full-time to provide for myself and for my daughter on a part-time basis, now that I am out of my ex's total control and emotional, mental, psychological, and physical abuse. My child's father and I live 10 miles away from oneanother. He does not care to work together with me for our daughter's benefit. He never has worked together with me on anything. I have tried and continue to try but never get anywhere with him. He wants what he wants and when he wants it. It is a "control thing" for him. I will always put my own feelings aside and put our daughter first. I will also always encourage that both parents are closely in our child's life too. I am just trying to personally "adjust" going from a full-time, stay-at-home mother to a part-time mother. It hurts being separated from my daughter when I fully cared for her all of her life, and every single day. I am sorry if I have offended anyone here! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Should the child be older than 21 months, for the baby to be separated 50%
from its mother? Sorry, here comes my bias.....you seem like the majoritiy of ex-wives, willing and able to make their ex-husbands pay for whatever they did to them. Your ex-husband has every right to see his daugher 50% regardless of age. If you were so concerned about your daughter, get a job....and Get a life.... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"mychynadoll" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... I am a single mother of a 21 month old baby girl. Referring to yourself as a "single mother" implies you were never married to the child's father. If the child's father is pressing for joint custody, your daughter is very lucky because most single fathers just want to walk away. I am my daughter's primary caregiver and have been a stay at home Mommy since her birth. Depending on the personal biases of the custody mediator, this may or may not be a factor. Research shows both fathers and mothers have equal ability to be good parents, and learning parenting skills is not complicated for either parent. Recently I have been forced out of my ex's home and he now wants 50% visitation/custody. I have no problem encouraging my child to have her Daddy in her life closely, ...and I am willing to agree to SOME visitation but not 50% for a child that is only 21 months of age. Have you considered the fact that the proposed custody split would be more like 1/3 of the time each, with your little girl spending the majority of the week in day care with a non-parent? I am in Pennsylvania. I filed for full custody of my daughter. I will willingly agree to visitation and some custody by her father but i do not feel that it is in the best interest of my child to be separated from me 50% of her life just to give her father his equal rights! How are you going to justify putting your daughter into day care for 9-10 hours per day? What about when she goes to school all day? There is no way she will be spending 50% of her time with either parent. You might want to reconsider your hard position about having more than 50% of the time with your daughter. Having her father share some of the time with her is called parenting, not equal rights. We, as her parents are our child's voice and her father cannot look past the 50% thing and think of what is best for his child. This does not seem to be working for my daughter. My child is too young to be separated from her Mommy for too long. And his perspective is having his daughter separated from her father for too long is not good either. And I just had my first custody hearing with a Mediator and both lawyers. My lawyer did not fight for me and for the best interest of my child. This is a very interesting comment. Usually custody and visitation mediation is done outside of the legal process in a less threatening environment. Your lawyers job is to represent you through the legal process and in court, if you end up there. I can't figure out why a lawyer would need to be present during private, confidential mediation sessions, except that they want to increase thier billable hours. I do not have much money and I am struggling to pay the rent each month as it is, but my baby girl is my life and I will fight for her and for what is in her best interest always! I am shocked that none of my concerns were brought up or were important to talk about. I am angry ,as my daughter's Mother, I have no say in what i feel is best for her. Your expectation for what will happen as the result of mediation is off base. These sessions are usually low-key and are designed to allow the mediator to meet with the parents individually, together, with and without the child, to observe their interactions and make a recommnedation to the court. One of my biggest concerns is that my child is not able to have any consistency in her daily life, and she is not able to stay on her routine schedule now that she is being tossed back and forth, and shared by both parents 50%. She needs structure and consistency in her life so that she will feel safe and secure. She no sooner gets settled into his home and then has to readjust when she comes back to my home to stay for 1 or 2 days. It takes me 1 day just to get my child back to the little girl that i know her to be. She is not my little girl when she returns to me from being away for 3-4 days at a time. She is destructive and throws bad fits, and is starting to hit me now too. It takes the next day until she is back to her sweet self, and this hurts my heart seeing her like this. This is ridiculous, and is not fair to my child. Another solution to all of these issues is to allow the child's father 100% custody. Then all of those problems would not exist. But the best solution is to come up with a joint parenting plan that deals with all of the issues, legal and residential, and how time, transitions, transportation, etc. will be handled. I must find another lawyer that will understand my situation and will want to look out for my daughter's best interest. The hearing was a waste of time, and they did not seem to be interested in how young my daughter was and that I have been her full primary care giver since her birth. My Lawyer promised to fight to get me Sole Custody, and then she said that i would get Primary Care Custody since i was always her full time primary caregiver and stay at home Mommy her whole life, but these things have not happened. What happened and what was the importance at this hearing was giving the father 50% and that was it! You need to ask your lawyer the differences between joint legal custody and joint residential custody. It seems you are mixing the two together. Child placement in the residence of one parent is different than 50/50 sharing of important decisions in the child's life. You also need to have your lawyer explain if there is a state law covering a rebuttable presumption of custody and access in PA. I do not see how it is fair for a child to be separated from their mother 50% of their young life. Can anyone help me make sense of this please? It makes about as much sense as a child being separated from their father fro 50% of their young life. I am broken hearted without my baby girl, and being without her 3-4 days at a time is unbearable. She needs her Mommy. I have been the one constant in her life and now she is uprooted between 2 parents and 2 homes and she is now acting out with terrible temper tantrums and throwing things. This is affecting her and the lawyers and mediator do not seem to care about any of these concerns except giving the father 50%! This just is not right! QUESTION- Should the child be older than 21 months, for the baby to be separated 50% from its mother? No. Regardless of the child's age mothers and fathers have equal opportunity under family law to be awarded custody and visitation. If you are unable to agree with the child's father about those issues in the mediation process, you will be forced to take whatever the judge rules at a future hearing. A few things to consider: Fathers with joint custody are more apt to pay child support. Children with fathers actively involved in their lives do much better. The court will be reluctant to change the joint visitation schedule you have already been using. Sharing custody 50/50 reduces your expenses. You daughter will not always be 21 months old. Mothers who allow the child's fathers liberal time with their children have more time to concentrate on careers, social lives, and do better in general. A jointly agreed to written parenting plan will cover all the details of how the two of you will raise your daughter. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:36:28 -0500, "mychynadoll"
wrote: This post is for all of you that cared enough to respond to my post and situation in such a polite and understanding way. THANK YOU! If I knew that this site was a crude "head-bashing" site, then I would not have wasted my time here,...sorry! I was searching for positive feedback only. None of you know me as a person or as a mother, nor do you know my full situation to judge me in any way. This is true that we do not know the situation well enough to make judgement calls; however, this group is populated with a wide variety of people to include custodial parents, non-custodial parents, spouses of non-custodial parents, and even just people who find the subject interesting. When you get "head bashed," you have probably mistakenly hit a nerve. Personally, I find it to be a window into the pain that many non-custodial parents feel. It will make you a better parent, in my opinion, to have some sort of insight into the pain that your daughter's father may feel should he be relugated to being a "visitor" in her life. Honestly, I might have just needed someone to talk to when I wrote my post. I am human too, and I may have been feeling emotional and down at the time. I also, did not fully explain my whole situation in my post for any of you to fully understand and respond to me in a more positive way. I am sorry. I was looking for positive feedback only, not criticism, and crude remarks. May I also ask that you try to respect the feelings of others with the words that you use in responding back to people in your posts. Your remarks and words in response to my post hurt my feelings a great deal. Apologies accepted. Someone asked a few questions, and I will gladly answer. Currently, I am working full-time to provide for myself and for my daughter on a part-time basis, now that I am out of my ex's total control and emotional, mental, psychological, and physical abuse. My child's father and I live 10 miles away from oneanother. He does not care to work together with me for our daughter's benefit. He never has worked together with me on anything. I have tried and continue to try but never get anywhere with him. He wants what he wants and when he wants it. It is a "control thing" for him. It's funny, but my ex and I agreed on many parenting issues (i.e. not even a toy gun for our kids) before we were divorced. After we divorced, I learned that maybe we hadn't agreed as much as I thought. It seemed as though every other gift from their father was a water gun or a nerf gun. Although I disagreed, I dealt with it as a difference of opinion. Yes, the kids had their toy guns from Daddy, but that didn't stop me from speaking with the children about guns and what acceptable uses of guns were. Hence, they were allowed to "shoot" at targets, but never at people or animals. I wonder if my ex and I would have continued to agree as we had when we were married if we had stayed married. If we hadn't, we'd have had to find a compromise. It's really no different with separated parents. Sometimes, we have to let the other parent be the parent they desire to be and it may be quite different than what we wanted for our child. But then, my dear, kindergarten is coming and soon you will have a whole other set of influences. All you can do is your best with what you have to work with. This is not to say that you should ever let the other parent abuse your child because that is how he/she wishes to parent. Some things go beyond parental differences. Still, you are going to have to live the best you can with what the court decides for you and, if your ex is not abusing your daughter, you really have no right to care for her more than 50% of the time. I will always put my own feelings aside and put our daughter first. I will also always encourage that both parents are closely in our child's life too. I am just trying to personally "adjust" going from a full-time, stay-at-home mother to a part-time mother. It hurts being separated from my daughter when I fully cared for her all of her life, and every single day. Given your daughter's age, I'll bet the adjustment is harder on you than it is on her. Might I remind you that 21 months old is close enough to 2 years old to have begun "the terrible twos." Part of the "terrible twos" is a child's desire to have some control, some autonomy... but still have the love they had before. Adjustment is difficult for ALL of you, not just your daughter and not just you. But a commitment to the adjustment NOW is going to reap great benefits for both you and your daughter in the future. Okay, so she has difficulty upon returning. What shall keep her whole is your loving her THROUGH the adjustment phase, not keeping her from the adjustment. It's easy to love when things are easy, you know? A great parent loves even when it is hard. Being a part-time parent and having to give up some of what you've come to know as your responsibility is hard. I assure you, however, becoming more of a caregiver than he has ever been before is probably hard on her father as well... but he loves her enough to do it. Aside from things that you may have yet to share, be grateful that he wants to be a father to her. I am sorry if I have offended anyone here! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
what did YOU DO to cause this?
"mychynadoll" wrote in message lkaboutparenting.com... This post is for all of you that cared enough to respond to my post and situation in such a polite and understanding way. THANK YOU! If I knew that this site was a crude "head-bashing" site, then I would not have wasted my time here,...sorry! I was searching for positive feedback only. None of you know me as a person or as a mother, nor do you know my full situation to judge me in any way. Honestly, I might have just needed someone to talk to when I wrote my post. I am human too, and I may have been feeling emotional and down at the time. I also, did not fully explain my whole situation in my post for any of you to fully understand and respond to me in a more positive way. I am sorry. I was looking for positive feedback only, not criticism, and crude remarks. May I also ask that you try to respect the feelings of others with the words that you use in responding back to people in your posts. Your remarks and words in response to my post hurt my feelings a great deal. Apologies accepted. Someone asked a few questions, and I will gladly answer. Currently, I am working full-time to provide for myself and for my daughter on a part-time basis, now that I am out of my ex's total control and emotional, mental, psychological, and physical abuse. My child's father and I live 10 miles away from oneanother. He does not care to work together with me for our daughter's benefit. He never has worked together with me on anything. I have tried and continue to try but never get anywhere with him. He wants what he wants and when he wants it. It is a "control thing" for him. I will always put my own feelings aside and put our daughter first. I will also always encourage that both parents are closely in our child's life too. I am just trying to personally "adjust" going from a full-time, stay-at-home mother to a part-time mother. It hurts being separated from my daughter when I fully cared for her all of her life, and every single day. I am sorry if I have offended anyone here! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | August 29th 04 05:28 AM |
In response to Kate | Bebelestrnge0721 | Single Parents | 19 | May 7th 04 04:33 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Nursing Strikes | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | April 17th 04 12:26 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | February 16th 04 09:58 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Childhood Vaccinations, Part 1/4 | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | February 16th 04 09:58 AM |