The Successes of Greg Hanson, the family ...

Hey Dan! When they interview you, will you record them?
I love the irony!

Greegor wrote:
Hey Dan! When they interview you, will you record them?
I love the irony!

Why wouldn't I?

alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents
In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust

Greg wrote
Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old?
Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly?

Kane's dictionary definition
a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce
an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather
than to elicit a reply

I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane.
I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric.

Kane wrote
The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other
subject threads is the issue.

When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue""
to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor
clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head.

Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"?

Kane wrote
It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice.

Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is
acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies,
evasions, and flat out bull****.

Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane?
No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL!
Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION!

Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain.

Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim.

PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved.

Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have
committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as
evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or
wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to
challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could
lose her children.

Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid,
irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk
away from them as those your challengers don't exist.

Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged.

YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish,
and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish.

Got that? Good.

There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and
withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the
people involved.

Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small
errors.

What a freaking CON ARTIST!

Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering
in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint?

In a thread called Foster Survivor take on Mary Ellen story
From: 0:- Date: Fri, Nov 10 2006 1:31 pm
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents

Greegor wrote:
Taking a stand on a legal technicality that impinges on the
right of a citizen to record a government official interviewing
themself

Greg wrote (about ""bad advice"")
is hardly a CRIME, and it's FUNNY when presented by
a person who perpetrates a computer breaking and
entering Felony to obtain the information!

Dan Sullivan wrote
Which law did I break, Greg?
FightCPS.com has no secret password..
Access is available to the public.

Greg wrote
Then why would you need to fake your IP ""Oliver Sutton""? g

Kane wrote
Then why would you fail to provide proof, dummy?
That could have been me, or Michael@, or even Doug.
You have no way of knowing.

It's too late Kane. Dan already self identified.

Another thread discussing ""bad advice"" vs. computer breakin
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...8006fe/?hl=en#

"Greegor" wrote in message
oups.com...
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents
In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust

Greg wrote
Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old?
Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly?

Kane's dictionary definition
a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce
an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather
than to elicit a reply

I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane.
I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric.

Kane wrote
The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other
subject threads is the issue.

When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue""
to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor
clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head.

Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"?

Kane wrote
It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice.

Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is
acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies,
evasions, and flat out bull****.

Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane?
No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL!
Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION!

Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain.

Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim.

PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved.

Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have
committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as
evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or
wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to
challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could
lose her children.

Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid,
irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk
away from them as those your challengers don't exist.

Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged.

YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish,
and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish.

Got that? Good.

There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and
withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the
people involved.

Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small
errors.

What a freaking CON ARTIST!

Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering
in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint?

Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses.

Greegor wrote:
Dan already self identified.

Yes, Greg, I'm me.

There I did it again.

Greegor wrote:
In a thread called Foster Survivor take on Mary Ellen story
From: 0:- Date: Fri, Nov 10 2006 1:31 pm
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents

Greegor wrote:
Taking a stand on a legal technicality that impinges on the
right of a citizen to record a government official interviewing
themself

Greg wrote (about ""bad advice"")
is hardly a CRIME, and it's FUNNY when presented by
a person who perpetrates a computer breaking and
entering Felony to obtain the information!

Dan Sullivan wrote
Which law did I break, Greg?
FightCPS.com has no secret password..
Access is available to the public.

Greg wrote
Then why would you need to fake your IP ""Oliver Sutton""? g

Kane wrote
Then why would you fail to provide proof, dummy?
That could have been me, or Michael@, or even Doug.
You have no way of knowing.

It's too late Kane. Dan already self identified.

He did? Boy, I must be missing some posts. I can't find that anywhere.

Do you mean when he created a phrase like this, "If you had a brain
cell Greg, Oliver Sutton, you'd have two"?

0:-]

In another thread where this was OFF TOPIC
Kane wrote
NO other subject [Dan's computer break in] is acceptable
for you to engage in here until you respond

Another BUFU fostie bites the dust is the subject in this message
thread.

You were the first to go off topic in this thread, Greg.

You just don't like OTHERS to do it when you are the subject.

YOU, for instance, went off topic when Dan posted your commentary on
using an illegal act to tryin and fight a CPS case.

Instead of dealing with the issue, you quickly switched to the
process...how he might have gotten your bull**** commentary and
dangerous advice.

Notice YOUR changes of topic, Greg.

That's what gives us license to keep dragging you back by the scruff of
your scruffy little neck to the subjects YOU bring up in the first
place.

This isn't about BUFU.

It's about you trying to use every possible dodge to avoid answering
for what you told that women to do.

Keep dodging. It's wonderfully entertaining.

But not successful.

We SEE what you are.

No one can miss it.

And those that use you LOVE that you do such things because it
indicates you are still dishonest and available for their dishonesty
peddling.

You are their 'venue,' stupid.

You told someone to reveal their crime in court in the middle of a
child protection case that could likely result in her arrest, and the
loss of her case.

Admit to it. Correct it, and get on with life.

Nothing less will suffice here, unless of course you can show us how
this action you suggest had a chance in hell of getting her her
children back.

Go for it.

Truth and dare.

I DARE you to correct your mistake, Greg.

0:-]


J.D.Wentworth wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message
oups.com...
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents
In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust

Greg wrote
Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old?
Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly?

Kane's dictionary definition
a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce
an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather
than to elicit a reply

I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane.
I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric.

Kane wrote
The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other
subject threads is the issue.

When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue""
to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor
clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head.

Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"?

Kane wrote
It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice.

Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is
acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies,
evasions, and flat out bull****.

Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane?
No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL!
Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION!

Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain.

Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim.

PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved.

Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have
committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as
evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or
wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to
challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could
lose her children.

Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid,
irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk
away from them as those your challengers don't exist.

Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged.

YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish,
and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish.

Got that? Good.

There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and
withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the
people involved.

Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small
errors.

What a freaking CON ARTIST!

Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering
in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint?

Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses.

Greegor wrote:
In another thread where this was OFF TOPIC

No thread YOU are in is off topic to ask YOU to answer for your lies,
deceit, and attempt to lab rat someone into doing what you are too
chicken **** to do yourself.

Just like Chuckles.

You are a coward.

And a bully of a coward trying to trap that women into losing her children.

Show us where your strategy would have even had the remotest of chances
of recovering her children from the state.

0:-



Kane wrote
NO other subject [Dan's computer break in] is acceptable
for you to engage in here until you respond
Another BUFU fostie bites the dust is the subject in this message
thread.
You were the first to go off topic in this thread, Greg.

You just don't like OTHERS to do it when you are the subject.

YOU, for instance, went off topic when Dan posted your commentary on
using an illegal act to tryin and fight a CPS case.

Instead of dealing with the issue, you quickly switched to the
process...how he might have gotten your bull**** commentary and
dangerous advice.

Notice YOUR changes of topic, Greg.

That's what gives us license to keep dragging you back by the scruff of
your scruffy little neck to the subjects YOU bring up in the first
place.

This isn't about BUFU.

It's about you trying to use every possible dodge to avoid answering
for what you told that women to do.

Keep dodging. It's wonderfully entertaining.

But not successful.

We SEE what you are.

No one can miss it.

And those that use you LOVE that you do such things because it
indicates you are still dishonest and available for their dishonesty
peddling.

You are their 'venue,' stupid.

You told someone to reveal their crime in court in the middle of a
child protection case that could likely result in her arrest, and the
loss of her case.

Admit to it. Correct it, and get on with life.

Nothing less will suffice here, unless of course you can show us how
this action you suggest had a chance in hell of getting her her
children back.

Go for it.

Truth and dare.

I DARE you to correct your mistake, Greg.

0:-]


J.D.Wentworth wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message
oups.com...
alt.support.child-protective-services, alt.parenting.spanking,
alt.support.foster-parents
In a thread titled Another BUFU fostie bites the dust

Greg wrote
Do these pederasts stop when they are 80 years old?
Do molesters in general stop when they get elderly?
Kane's dictionary definition
a rhetorical question is one asked solely to produce
an effect (especially to make an assertion) rather
than to elicit a reply
I actually hoped for answers to my questions, Kane.
I had no idea that the Socratic method was rhetoric.

Kane wrote
The "BUFU Fostie" by your joining in on it, while running from other
subject threads is the issue.
When you try to justify hauling some pet pukey ""issue""
to every place where it doesn't belong, Occam's razor
clearly says you are jest a might tetched in the head.

Aren't you able to spot your own "affectations"?

Kane wrote
It's time you answered for your accusations and your dangrous advice.

Do so now, or live with the consequences. NO other subject is
acceptable for you to engage in here until you respond on your lies,
evasions, and flat out bull****.
Again I assert Occam's razor. Off your meds Kane?
No other subject is acceptable here? ROFL!
Clear signs of Megalomania and OBSESSION!

Not to me, at any rate. And I'll continue to make that plain.

Prove Dan committed a felony as you claim.

PROVE IT WITH LEGAL STATUTE, the only way it can be proved.

Defend your position on someone revealing to the court they have
committed a crime (stop defending the crime...that won't work as
evasion or in any other way...we aren't debating it rightness or
wrongness morally, we are debating the danger to the women) to
challenge the law while in the middle of another case, where she could
lose her children.

Do the program, Greg. Stop making these kind so outlandish, stupid,
irrational and lying statements and figuring you can simply then walk
away from them as those your challengers don't exist.

Don't post here if you don't want to be challenged.

YOU AND I both have free speech. Your to spout bull**** all you wish,
and ours to challenge your bull**** all we wish.

Got that? Good.

There are two easy ways out for you. Admit your error and apologize and
withdraw your claims on both issues.....and do so directly to the
people involved.

Easy eh? A man could do it instantly. Even Doug has done it on small
errors.
What a freaking CON ARTIST!

Your BUDDY VIOLATES like that and you try all this blustering
in the hopes the victim will back down from the complaint?
Yes - also a crime - intimidating witnesses.