A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #3  
Old April 21st 07, 11:54 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Kenneth S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com


Nowadays, it seems to me, the only people who talk about "real men" are
feminists who are trying to get men to do what suits women.

(By the way, I suggest you consult a dictionary about the meaning of
"homo sapiens." The hyenas are laughing up their sleeves at you.)


  #5  
Old April 22nd 07, 07:44 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
teachrmama
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,905
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.


The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.


And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?


  #6  
Old April 22nd 07, 08:23 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Ray Fischer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 152
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

Robert wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.


The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals.


Greedy goose-stepping fascist want to steal money from innocent
people so that you can sit on your ass. You have no morals and
don't give a **** about justice. All you care about is forcing your
19th century paternalism upon people.

--
Ray Fischer


  #7  
Old April 22nd 07, 09:15 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Robert[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.


The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com

  #8  
Old April 22nd 07, 11:13 PM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Dusty Steenbock
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.


The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.

--

A moral man person has no problem supporting thier children. Most people In
this group are moral people. A sane and Intelligent perosn realizes that the
ncp has to get by as well without undue burden on thier part.
You are niether sane or intelligent. You are a nazi, because you have said
all fathers should be locked up forcibly, work 70 hour weeks, and be give
all thier money to the all powerful, n'er do wrong mommy. Your father must
have ****ed over you and your mother, but you fail to recognize hats far
from the truth In most of todays situations. To sum It all up, you are
WRONG, and TWISTED In all of your beliefs.


  #9  
Old April 23rd 07, 05:10 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Animal05[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling

Dusty Steenbock wrote:

"Robert" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".


A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.

--


A moral man person has no problem supporting thier children. Most people In
this group are moral people. A sane and Intelligent perosn realizes that the
ncp has to get by as well without undue burden on thier part.


An intelligent person realizes you cannot legislate morality. Robert
proves how stupid he is with his frothing

You are niether sane or intelligent. You are a nazi, because you have said
all fathers should be locked up forcibly, work 70 hour weeks, and be give
all thier money to the all powerful, n'er do wrong mommy. Your father must
have ****ed over you and your mother, but you fail to recognize hats far
from the truth In most of todays situations. To sum It all up, you are
WRONG, and TWISTED In all of your beliefs.


  #10  
Old April 23rd 07, 05:15 AM posted to talk.abortion,alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling


"teachrmama" wrote in message
...

"Robert" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:43:29 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Robert" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:02:39 -0700, "Chris" wrote:


"Ms. MICHEL'LE" wrote in message
...

From: (Shawn Hirn)
In article ,
(Ms. MICHEL'LE) wrote:
Cardinal Hails Court's Abortion Ruling
WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 18, 2007 (Zenit.org).- The chairman of the

U.S.
bishops' Committee for Pro-Life Activities has welcomed the Supreme
Court decision upholding a ban on partial birth abortion.

Why would this surprise anyone? This news story warrants one

paragraph
at most.

Why is it that SOME men have a problem with Pro-life? Could it be

that
they dont like paying child support? Taking care of their
responsibilities?? Hmmmm?

"Child support" is the man's responsibility ONLY legally.



Only to homo sapient males that have the morals of a Hyena.
A real man doesn't need a law to force him to do right to the children
that he sired. Or to assist other children to the best of his ability.

The problem ailing you is your confusing "legal" with "moral".

A no good son of a bitch, that has to be forced to support his
children, whines about a "un fair law" , has no sense of morals. Like
a Hyena.
A moral man requires no force to do right by his children. A mother
****er like you that whines about being forced to support his children
has no morals.


And a woman who gets pregnant with no intention of ever supporting her own
children, but depends on a man or Big Daddy Gubmint to take care of her
responsibilities is immoral. I guess you would also have to say that a
woman who brings a child into this world then dumps it at a hospital or

fire
station is equally immoral, because she had the sex, then chose to walk

away
from the responsibilities that she, herself, helped create. Right?


But that's............................................ ... different.






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush: State won't appeal ruling allowing teen's abortion wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 May 3rd 05 06:28 PM
MICHIGAN: Attorney General Mike Cox Hails Passage of Child SupportBills David Briggman Child Support 6 December 22nd 04 04:46 AM
Ex-Boyfriend Can't Stop Abortion A woman's right to have an abortion"is not subject to being vetoed by a woman's husband or partner," said Conahan, Clisby Pregnancy 0 January 19th 04 09:36 PM
Abortion ruling Ronni Child Support 12 January 1st 04 05:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.