Spears travesty proves our point!

Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

I think that one would even exceed the imagination of Gene Rodenberry!

Note that even up to this point, Federline still has only a temporary
custody order. This despite the fact that Spears has had NUMEROUS
public mental "meltdowns" and has REPEATEDLY missed and dissed court
appearances.

And I don't think it can all be explained away by the favored
treatment Hollywood-elite receive in LA courts. I cannot conceive of a
male "super-star" acting in similar manner and still being allowed
opportunities to get back any form of custody. Heck, I have a hard
time believing Federline even got the temporary order that he has. I
doubt seriously he would have had Spears not being so completely IN
YOUR FACE with her antics -- to the point that the courts had no
choice.

The fact remains clear:
Despite what the courts might "say" and despite how the laws might be
"written", the truth is that woman are granted preferential "assumed"
custody in family court. The only way a man can ever be granted
custody is for the woman to be proven beyond a shadow of doubt
COMPLETELY unsuited. On the other hand, for a woman to be granted
custody, all she need do is want it.

It's a pathetic society we live in !

50/50 custody is the only solution!!!



wrote in message
...
Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

I think that one would even exceed the imagination of Gene Rodenberry!

Note that even up to this point, Federline still has only a temporary
custody order. This despite the fact that Spears has had NUMEROUS
public mental "meltdowns" and has REPEATEDLY missed and dissed court
appearances.

And I don't think it can all be explained away by the favored
treatment Hollywood-elite receive in LA courts. I cannot conceive of a
male "super-star" acting in similar manner and still being allowed
opportunities to get back any form of custody. Heck, I have a hard
time believing Federline even got the temporary order that he has. I
doubt seriously he would have had Spears not being so completely IN
YOUR FACE with her antics -- to the point that the courts had no
choice.

The fact remains clear:
Despite what the courts might "say" and despite how the laws might be
"written", the truth is that woman are granted preferential "assumed"
custody in family court. The only way a man can ever be granted
custody is for the woman to be proven beyond a shadow of doubt
COMPLETELY unsuited. On the other hand, for a woman to be granted
custody, all she need do is want it.

wrote in message
...
Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

Don't overlook the obvious. The judge is probably a dirty old man who likes
looking at fake boobs and fantasizing about whether Spears is wearing her
underwear while in his courtroom. He could be dragging out the case for his
own personal jollies.

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in

He could be dragging out the case for his own personal jollies.

Bob, you assume the judge is male?

"DB" wrote in message
news

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in

He could be dragging out the case for his own personal jollies.

Bob, you assume the judge is male?

If a judge whose name is "Scott M. Gorgon" is not a male I give up.

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"DB" wrote in message
news

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in

He could be dragging out the case for his own personal jollies.

Bob, you assume the judge is male?

If a judge whose name is "Scott M. Gorgon" is not a male I give up.

I never assume anything any more where all common sense and logic is long
abandoned!

On Jan 23, 11:08*am, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

Re-thinking my own position on this matter, it has occurred to me that
perhaps the truth of the matter is the opposite from what I had
originally assumed.

Perhaps it is not so much that Britney is "getting away" with this
crap because she is a female....but rather she has recieved what
sanctions that she has (slight as they are)....only because she *IS* a
celebrity and this has all unfoled under the spot light of public
scrutiny.

After thinking about it, I reminded myself that whereas Britney has at
least temporarily lost custody and visitation right due to her antics
(I'm still wondering why its only "temporarily"), there are women who
are pulling all sorts of wigged-out nonsense and getting away with it
unscathed. Women all across the USA are denying father's visitation,
moving out of town (absconding with the kids) for 'a job", or
neglecting the kids while they go out to score a hit of crack, etc etc
They get away with it because there is no media spot light...no
paparazzi....no E! True Hollywood Story to bring the matter to the
public eye.

Maybe it is a combination of both though...IOW, the original point was that
a man would never get away with this.

By all accounts she refused to return the kids from a scheduled visit, if a
man were to do that we would have been arrested, imho

wrote in message
...
On Jan 23, 11:08 am, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

Re-thinking my own position on this matter, it has occurred to me that
perhaps the truth of the matter is the opposite from what I had
originally assumed.

Perhaps it is not so much that Britney is "getting away" with this
crap because she is a female....but rather she has recieved what
sanctions that she has (slight as they are)....only because she *IS* a
celebrity and this has all unfoled under the spot light of public
scrutiny.

After thinking about it, I reminded myself that whereas Britney has at
least temporarily lost custody and visitation right due to her antics
(I'm still wondering why its only "temporarily"), there are women who
are pulling all sorts of wigged-out nonsense and getting away with it
unscathed. Women all across the USA are denying father's visitation,
moving out of town (absconding with the kids) for 'a job", or
neglecting the kids while they go out to score a hit of crack, etc etc
They get away with it because there is no media spot light...no
paparazzi....no E! True Hollywood Story to bring the matter to the
public eye.

wrote in message
...
On Jan 23, 11:08 am, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
wrote in message

...

Simple question:
I what alternate universe could a man act the way Britney Spears has
over the past year and *STILL* be given continued chances at getting
back full custody of his children??

Re-thinking my own position on this matter, it has occurred to me that
perhaps the truth of the matter is the opposite from what I had
originally assumed.

Perhaps it is not so much that Britney is "getting away" with this
crap because she is a female....but rather she has recieved what
sanctions that she has (slight as they are)....only because she *IS* a
celebrity and this has all unfoled under the spot light of public
scrutiny.

After thinking about it, I reminded myself that whereas Britney has at
least temporarily lost custody and visitation right due to her antics
(I'm still wondering why its only "temporarily"), there are women who
are pulling all sorts of wigged-out nonsense and getting away with it
unscathed. Women all across the USA are denying father's visitation,
moving out of town (absconding with the kids) for 'a job", or
neglecting the kids while they go out to score a hit of crack, etc etc
They get away with it because there is no media spot light...no
paparazzi....no E! True Hollywood Story to bring the matter to the
public eye.
-------------------------------------------

Tell me something name a MALE CELEBRITY who has behaved anything like
Ms. Spears, and I mean ANYTHING who was considered to be in the running for
SOLE CUSTODY!! Besides Michael Jackson. Say what you will about Jackson he
WAS "acquitted." Spears was NOT! If Spears was a father he would have had
his parental rights terminated long ago.