AIDS Day Scam: Doc Exposes Vaccine Cult Conspiracy

AIDS Day Scam: Doc Exposes Vaccine Cult Conspiracy by MIKE ADAMS (NATURAL
NEWS.COM)

(EDITOR'S NOTE: The following YouTube video reveals shocking uncut footage
from Brent Leung's documentary "House of Numbers" about the truth about AIDS
as told by Dr. Luc Montagnier. AIDS can be reversed. Nutrition is the
answer. Hear it straight from the co-discoverer of HIV. Posted by
NaturalNews.com)

(December 1, 2009)

When Brent Leung started showcasing his groundbreaking new documentary film
about AIDS, "House of Numbers" (www.HouseOfNumbers.com), he had no way to
comprehend the wave of defamatory attacks that would be unleashed against
him.

Promoters of conventional AIDS theories -- with all their vaccines and
pharmaceuticals -- have gone on a rampage against Leung, calling him an
"AIDS denialist" -- with an obvious invocation of the similar-sounding
"Holocaust denialist" phrase.

The implication, of course, is that if you deny any part of conventional
AIDS theories, you're as bad as a Nazi war criminal.

It's a curious comparison, especially given that the origins of the modern
pharmaceutical industry are found precisely in the Nazi regime where
pharmaceutical scientists routinely conducted medical experiments on Jewish
prisoners.

As a fascinating matter of historical fact, the Chairman of Bayer in the
1950's (yes, the same Bayer that makes Bayer Aspirin) was Dr. Fritz ter
Meer, a convicted war criminal, who after committing crimes against humanity
was sentenced to seven years in prison at the Nuremberg war trials.

The pharmaceutical industry operating today is largely a cabal of unindicted
criminals who are guilty of crimes against humanity, and one of their
favorite methods of multiplying their profits is to push a disease, then
sell a vaccine they claim "treats" the disease.

It's the same old scam, whether we're talking about cervical cancer, swine
flu or even AIDS.

Getting back to Brent Leung and his film House of Numbers, when the
AIDS-pharma promoters saw his film, they knew they had to attack the
messenger and try to discredit him as quickly as possible.

So they claimed Leung quoted the scientists in the film out of context,
thereby distorting what they were saying.

In particular, Leung was attacked for his interview with Dr. Luc Montagnier,
the Nobel Prize-winning co-discoverer of the AIDS virus, who explained to
Leung during the interview that AIDS can be overcome (cured) with nutrition,
and that the vaccine approach is entirely overblown.

Such an idea, of course, spells financial doom for drug companies and their
cohorts, all of whom profit from the oft-repeated myth that "AIDS has no
cure" and that only drugs can treat AIDS.

So the critics went after Leung for daring to include Montagnier's words in
his documentary. One critic in particular, Jeanne Bergman from an "AIDS
truth" website, claimed that Leung "sucker punched" Montagnier.

She also claimed Leung quoted Montagnier out of context and blamed him for
asking "leading questions" by saying, "Montagnier does not spontaneously say
in the film that a healthy diet will clear the virus. Leung asked leading
questions and then presented a fragment of conversation out of context."

As you'll soon see, Jeanne Bergman has no clue what she's talking about. But
that's actually par for the course when it comes to the AIDS industry.

The raw interview with Luc Montagnier - revealed!

To help provide clarity to this issue, NaturalNews spoke with House of
Numbers filmmaker Brent Leung who agreed to provide us with exclusive,
un-cut footage of the conversation with Luc Montagnier, complete with
subtitles.

NaturalNews transcribed this un-cut conversation and below, we've reprinted
the words exchanged between Brent Leung and Dr. Luc Montagnier.

Here, you'll see that, in fact, Brent Leung did not quote Montagnier out of
context, and that Montagnier makes his position crystal clear on points such
as how nutrition may help reverse an AIDS infection.

What this transcript (and video) proves is that Leung's critics are, in
fact, deeply misinformed in their accusations of Leung, and are guilty of
printing false and defamatory information that accuses Leung of distorting
the interviews used in his film. Read this transcript to see for yourself:

The transcript between Brent Leung and Dr. Luc Montagnier

Leung [the filmmaker]: You talked about oxidative stress earlier. Is
treating oxidative stress one of the best ways to deal with the African AIDS
epidemic?

Montagnier [the scientist]: I think this is one way to approach, to decrease
the rate of transmission, because I believe HIV we can be exposed to HIV
many times without bring chronically infected, our immune system will get
rid of the virus within a few weeks, if you have a good immune system; and
this is the problem also of the African people. Their nutrition is not very
equilibrated, they are in oxidative stress, even if they are not infected
with HIV; so their immune system doesn't work well already. So it's prone,
it can, you know, allow HIV to get in and persist. So there are many ways
which are not the vaccine, the magic name, the vaccine, many ways to
decrease the transmission just by simple measures of nutrition, giving
antioxidants -- proper antioxidants -- hygiene measures, fighting the other
infections. So they are not spectacular, but they could, you know, decrease
very well the epidemic, to the level they are in occidental countries,
western countries.

Leung: So if you have a good immune system, then your body can naturally get
rid of HIV?

Montagnier: Yes.

Leung: Oh, interesting. Do you think we should have more of a push for
antioxidants, and things of that nature, in Africa than antiretrovirals
(AIDS drugs)?

Montagnier: We should push for more, you know, a combination of measures;
antioxidants, nutrition advice, nutritions, fighting other infections --
malaria, tuberculosis, parasitosis, worms -- education of course, genital
hygiene for women and men also, very simple measures which [are] not very
expensive, but which could do a lot. And this is my, actually my worry about
the many spectacular action for the global funds to buy drugs and so on, and
Bill Gates and so on, for the vaccine. But you know those kind of measures
are not very well funded, they're not funded at all, or they are, you know,
it really depends on the local government to take choice of this, but local
governments they take advice of the scientific advisors from the intelligent
institutions, and they don't get this kind of advice very often.

Leung: Well there's no money in nutrition, right? There's no profit.

Montagnier: There's no profit, yes. Water is important. Water is key.

Leung: Now one thing you said, you were talking about the fact that if you
have a built immune system, it is possible to get rid of HIV naturally. If
you take a poor African who's been infected and you build up their immune
system, is it possible for them to also naturally get rid of it?

Montagnier: [Nodding yes] I would think so.

Leung: That's an important point.

Montagnier: It's important knowledge which is completely neglected. People
always think of drugs and vaccine. So this is a message which may be
different from what you heard before, no?

Leung: The closing?

Montagnier: No, no, yes, my message, it's different from what you heard from
(Anthony) Fauci or...

Leung: Yes, it's a little different.

Montagnier: Little different.

Analysis of the conversation

As you can see from this transcript (and from watching the video), Leung
asks no loaded questions and engages in no trickery whatsoever.

If anything, Leung is quite reserved in his questioning, preferring to allow
Montagnier to do most of the talking. In particular, Leung does not
interrupt Montagnier, nor does he attempt to verbally entrap him in any way.

For his part, Dr. Montagnier doesn't mince words. He's very clear on the
points he's making, saying them several times in different ways. His points
are, essentially (paraphrased):

.. You can be exposed to AIDS without getting infected.
.. A strong immune system can protect you against AIDS.
.. With the help of good nutrition, you can fight off AIDS.
.. The importance of AIDS vaccines is exaggerated.
.. AIDS can be approached with low-cost, highly-effective alternatives to
vaccines.
.. What the African people really need is better nutrition to protect
themselves from AIDS.
.. The facts about nutrition and AIDS are being neglected (by the medical
establishment).

He's not wishy-washy about these things. He speaks with clear intent and
does not waver on these points. At the end of the interview, before the
cameras are turned off, he even acknowledges to Leung that what he just said
was essentially a "bombshell" of information that stands at odds with
conventional AIDS scientists such as Fauci.

Now, if you go back to the House of Numbers movie and watch the clips of
Leung's conversation with Montagnier, you'll find that the quotes used in
the film are right in line with what Montagnier is saying in his un-cut
conversation. There is absolutely no distortion, no out-of-context quoting
going on here. If anything, Leung has acted in a very professional way in
choosing quotes for the final film that accurately reflect the essence of
what Montagnier is communicating.

And for that, Leung gets blasted by critics and accused of misrepresenting
what these scientists are saying. That's because the conventional
AIDS-pharma proponents can't stand up to real-world scrutiny.

Their AIDS mythologies are based on lies and disinformation, so instead of
engaging in intelligent debate based on the available evidence, they simply
attack any person who questions the tenants of their AIDS-pharma cult.

What the drug companies don't want you to know about AIDS

The drug companies don't want you to know the truth about AIDS... or cancer,
or diabetes or heart disease.

There's a simple truth that, if widely acknowledged, would absolutely
devastate the pharmaceutical industry with all its heavily-promoted vaccines
and patented chemicals.

What simple truth is that?

AIDS has a cure. Cancer has a cure. Diabetes can be cured. Heart disease can
be cured. The list goes on and on...

When the co-discoverer of the AIDS virus says, on camera, that essentially
AIDS can be cured with nutrition, he is speaking a disallowed truth that the
drug companies (and their minions) cannot tolerate.

If people knew that AIDS could be halted -- or even reversed -- with
nutrients such as antioxidants, they might not put so much faith in the
billions of dollars worth of vaccines being pushed all around the world by
not only Big Pharma, but even Bill and Melinda Gates, too (who have funneled
hundreds of millions of dollars into the pockets of the drug companies to
inject more children with vaccines).

This is why Brent Leung's film House of Numbers
(www.HouseOfNumbers.com) is simultaneously so courageous and so relevant to
modern health care. It's the first film to stand up and declare, "The AIDS
Emperor wears no clothes!"

This film, in fact, presents stunning evidence that, in many ways, exposes
Big Pharma's AIDS vaccine scam. No wonder Leung is being so viciously
attacked by the AIDS industry. Hundreds of thousands of jobs in the
sick-care industry depend on more people being diagnosed with AIDS and
treated with monopoly-priced drugs!

More un-cut footage coming your way

The AIDS industry's attacks against Brent Leung aren't over yet. Under
pressure from proponents of the conventional AIDS industry, two more
scientists interviewed for the film have now claimed their words were also
taken out of context.

Through an exclusive arrangement with Brent Leung, NaturalNews plans to air
full, un-cut footage of the interviews with these scientists, proving beyond
any question that their words were in no way distorted by Leung.

Why you can't argue with members of the "AIDS vaccine cult"
Meanwhile, I thought about calling some of the accusers over at the "AIDS
truth" website, but they have a statement on their website that already says
everything you need to know:

"We will not engage in any public or private debate with AIDS denialists or
respond to requests from journalists who overtly support AIDS denialist
causes."

Got all that? In other words, unless you agree with them, they won't talk to
you!

Fascinating bit of intellectual protectionism, isn't it? This is precisely
how the entire conventional AIDS industry works, by the way: You're either
"on board" with their current AIDS vaccine mythology, or you're ostracized
and shunned by the whole crowd.

With such a polarizing philosophy in place, it's obviously impossible to
talk to these people on any intelligent level. No facts, no evidence, no
science will even be considered by them unless it "pre-agrees" with their
foredrawn conclusions.

This is why the AIDS industry offers no solutions for AIDS -- and it never
will. The "search for a cure for AIDS" is about as hopeless (and fraudulent)
as the search for a cure for cancer. No industry that depends on the
continuation of disease will ever produce a cure for that disease. It would
put too many people out of a job and cost billions in lost profits.

To keep the profits flowing, the AIDS industry has to keep the propaganda
pumping, too, and that requires attacking anyone who dares to stand up and
speak the truth about AIDS, HIV and vaccines.

The situation is actually worse than that: Leung merely stood up and asked
some questions about AIDS and HIV. He didn't shove his own conclusions down
our throats. He didn't create a distorted, one-sided documentary. In fact,
Leung goes out of his way to present views from scientists who disagree on
many points. If anything, Leung has gone to great lengths to keep his own
opinion out of the film.

It is a sad day in our modern world when a young filmmaker who simply dares
to ask some sensible questions is vilified by a multi-billion-dollar
industry that depends on sickness and disease to stay in business. Rather
than being attacked, truth-seekers like Leung should be celebrated for their
courage and tenacity. We need more people like Leung in the world, asking
more questions about more diseases (and the fraudulent industries behind
them).

Of course, I know all too well what it's like to be in Leung's shoes. As
someone who has spent the last several years asking similar questions in
print, I know that in our modern world, there is no reward for telling the
truth.

There is little tolerance in our profit-driven system of corporate greed for
people who ask legitimate journalistic questions. The very act of asking
questions is, in and of itself, now considered practically traitorous.

The mainstream media isn't asking the tough questions anymore... it has
already surrendered its soul to Big Business. There's no room for
independent thinkers in our global corporate propaganda machine, and those
who attempt to ask reasonable questions will always be condemned for
stepping out of line and daring to challenge the status quo.

Those whose incomes depend on the status quo will always disparage
independent thinkers who question it.

Watch trailers and clips for House of Numbers he
http://www.HouseOfNumbers.com

The film isn't yet released to the public, but we expect to see a
distribution deal in the works soon, and NaturalNews will alert you of when
and where you can see the entire film once it's available.

ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED
http://www.naturalnews.com/027631_AI...f_Numbers.html

"john" wrote in message
...



The implication, of course, is that if you deny any part of
conventional AIDS theories, you're as bad as a Nazi war criminal.

It's a curious comparison, especially given that the origins of the
modern pharmaceutical industry are found precisely in the Nazi regime
where pharmaceutical scientists routinely conducted medical
experiments on Jewish prisoners.


They also experimented on American soldiers.

In article ,
john wrote:
Promoters of conventional AIDS theories -- with all their vaccines and
pharmaceuticals -- have gone on a rampage against Leung, calling him an
"AIDS denialist" -- with an obvious invocation of the similar-sounding
"Holocaust denialist" phrase.

The implication, of course, is that if you deny any part of conventional
AIDS theories, you're as bad as a Nazi war criminal.

If somebody says you have your head up your ass, and at another
time he or somebody else says that the Nazis had their heads up
their asses, it does not follow that the person who said you have
your head up your ass was likening you to the Nazis.

--
David Canzi

"David Canzi" wrote in message
...
In article ,
john wrote:
Promoters of conventional AIDS theories -- with all their vaccines and
pharmaceuticals -- have gone on a rampage against Leung, calling him an
"AIDS denialist" -- with an obvious invocation of the similar-sounding
"Holocaust denialist" phrase.

The implication, of course, is that if you deny any part of conventional
AIDS theories, you're as bad as a Nazi war criminal.

If somebody says you have your head up your ass, and at another
time he or somebody else says that the Nazis had their heads up
their asses, it does not follow that the person who said you have
your head up your ass was likening you to the Nazis.

--
David Canzi

Actually the term denialist is used in relation to anyone who doubts the
official story of the holocaust (ie you are an anti-semite and neo-nazi if
you do so) so the term aids-denier is meant to link the two. After all the
same people are running the AIDS hoax and the auschwitz hoax.

On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:15:30 -0000, "john" wrote:
"David Canzi" wrote in message

If somebody says you have your head up your ass, and at another
time he or somebody else says that the Nazis had their heads up
their asses, it does not follow that the person who said you have
your head up your ass was likening you to the Nazis.

Actually the term denialist is used in relation to anyone who doubts the
official story of the holocaust (ie you are an anti-semite and neo-nazi if
you do so) so the term aids-denier is meant to link the two. After all the
same people are running the AIDS hoax and the auschwitz hoax.

Everyone's an AIDS denier, even David.

My last three CD4 counts were 150, 97 and 100.

I came to misc.health.aids over two and a half years ago to ask one
simple question: "Do I have AIDS?" See Usenet article
or
http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/articles/index.php?article=285ou2hcrnpm30i3c8ft0v57hqs3nn3t .

So, I'll pose the question again: Do I have AIDS?

Or, to put it another way: Do you deny I have AIDS? Are you an AIDS
denier?
--
http://www.hiv-poz.co.uk/
14 years, 10 months and 20 days.

"john" wrote:


"David Canzi" wrote in message
...
In article ,
john wrote:
Promoters of conventional AIDS theories -- with all their vaccines and
pharmaceuticals -- have gone on a rampage against Leung, calling him an
"AIDS denialist" -- with an obvious invocation of the similar-sounding
"Holocaust denialist" phrase.

The implication, of course, is that if you deny any part of conventional
AIDS theories, you're as bad as a Nazi war criminal.

If somebody says you have your head up your ass, and at another
time he or somebody else says that the Nazis had their heads up
their asses, it does not follow that the person who said you have
your head up your ass was likening you to the Nazis.

--
David Canzi

Actually the term denialist is used in relation to anyone who doubts the
official story of the holocaust (ie you are an anti-semite and neo-nazi if
you do so) so the term aids-denier is meant to link the two. After all the
same people are running the AIDS hoax and the auschwitz hoax.


Why am I not surprised that John is a Holocaust denier?

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com