Nazareth toddler third Israeli to die after receiving swine flu vaccination

"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message

A comment on the evidence before me. Kalokerinos was behaving as an
insane person would behave, and mentioning this is not ad hominem.

Yes it is, end of story. You are not qualified to diagnose insanity, and a
practicing medical doctor would hardly be allowed to practice if insane.

That is why Rebecca Carley had her licence yanked. Remember her? She
is probably one of your heroes.

John, do you believe that the WHO and Save The Children are
DELIBERATELY committing genocide in Africa?




"Ah, yes, the lying sleazebag McCandless."

Again a comment on the evidence before me. McCandless says that she
can actually see metallic mercury in the urine of children. Thus she
is a liar. She charges money to provide a useless medical treatment.
Thus she is a sleazebag.


You are not qualified to offer a comment, obvious ad hominem, and we know
why you abuse these 2, as they both say vaccines cause autism or death.


Are you suggesting that someone who says that she can see metallic
mercury in urine is telling the truth?

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message

You are not qualified to offer a comment, obvious ad hominem, and we know
why you abuse these 2, as they both say vaccines cause autism or death.


Are you suggesting that someone who says that she can see metallic
mercury in urine is telling the truth?


Avoiding the fact scopies law is a logical fallacy, no surprise there

and lets deal with your 20 lies first shall we
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/real.html

"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message

You are not qualified to offer a comment, obvious ad hominem, and we know
why you abuse these 2, as they both say vaccines cause autism or death.


Are you suggesting that someone who says that she can see metallic
mercury in urine is telling the truth?


Avoiding the fact scopies law is a logical fallacy, no surprise there

As it simply is not a logical fallacy but a statement of fact, there
is nothing to talk about.


and lets deal with your 20 lies first shall we
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/real.html


My friends were disappointed that you had taken their picture off that
page, but I reassured them that it was still up there on the page
about me. They were quite excited to be featured on a major kook site.

Oh, and trying to discredit me by citing whale.to immediately triggers
Scopie's Law.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
Oh, and trying to discredit me by citing whale.to immediately triggers
Scopie's Law.


LOL. Oh well, good to know you haven't any argument
http://www.whale.to/b/appeal_to_incredulity.html

you don't have any credit in the real world, abusive, liar, and using a
logical fallacy

"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
Oh, and trying to discredit me by citing whale.to immediately triggers
Scopie's Law.


LOL. Oh well, good to know you haven't any argument
http://www.whale.to/b/appeal_to_incredulity.html

What has an appeal to incredulity got to do with anything?


you don't have any credit in the real world, abusive, liar, and using a
logical fallacy


--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
...
"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
Oh, and trying to discredit me by citing whale.to immediately triggers
Scopie's Law.


LOL. Oh well, good to know you haven't any argument
http://www.whale.to/b/appeal_to_incredulity.html

What has an appeal to incredulity got to do with anything?


It is your main argument. Scopie's Law is based on that. Logical fallacy

"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
.. .
"john" wrote:


"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
Oh, and trying to discredit me by citing whale.to immediately triggers
Scopie's Law.


LOL. Oh well, good to know you haven't any argument
http://www.whale.to/b/appeal_to_incredulity.html

What has an appeal to incredulity got to do with anything?


It is your main argument. Scopie's Law is based on that. Logical fallacy


No, Scopie's Law is not based on an appeal to incredulity, unless you
count the incredulity that anyone could believe the rubbish on the
relevant web site. Appeal to Incredibility, perhaps.

--
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

"Peter Bowditch" wrote in message
No, Scopie's Law is not based on an appeal to incredulity, unless you
count the incredulity that anyone could believe the rubbish on the
relevant web site. Appeal to Incredibility, perhaps.


Whatever, it's a logical fallacy. Perhaps you could explain Scopie's Law in
detail so we can actually get the so called logic it's based on.