If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Child Support Guidelines are UNFAIR! Lets join together to fight them!
http://childsupportunfair.com
I am not OPPOSING child support, what I am saying is, lets support the child(ren) but not at the expense of your own life, Justice was to be equal under our constitution, the ability to make something of your life! $1300.00 a month of CURRENT chilsupport ORDERED between two courts and take home before tax $1666.67 (and they claim that it could even go UP even though I am only bringing home before tax that amount!) is absurd! Just fix the guidelines, give deductions for what it costs for your basic needs to live and dont make it so even if you are making $70,000.00 you bring home only 30-35 of it, they can even in cases go higher then 50% I am told, they can get 60-70% its out crazy. I do support taking care of your children and in my situation by the way I even contest that they are mine, she slept with more people then you could even imagine, she admits this even to the case worker! I asked for DNA tests they never sent the packet instead they filed and did not serve ME, they served my last address, and me having the SAME phone number they didnt even call to confirm, I had no idea they were trying to serve me, then they get a default, I found this out with my check hitting a LOW 50% of what it should be. Bring into the forum more recourse for those obligated to pay, we have to live too, I am not living some lavish lifestyle, just barely getting by and now due to this I can not even get school items for my other two children that live with me 40% of the time, and im still having to pay the mother of these two as well, ive even tried to get the court to make her pay they denied that! The mother here claims she wants my money just to pay for an SUV, AND SAID THIS IN OPEN COURT, the Judge said she did not have to spend the money ON THE CHILDREN and it was not an issue! ITS OUT RIGHT REDICULAS! THERE ARE CUSTODIAL PARENTS OUT THERE WHO DONT EVEN THINK TO USE THE MONEY FOR THE CHILDREN ONLY AS REVENGE UPON THE PERSON THEY ARE NOT WITH ANY MORE AND ONLY FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL SELFISH GAMES! THE COURTS OPENLY ALLOW THIS! THEY SAY SOME PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO DONT PAY THEIR CHILD SUPPORT ARE DEAD BEATS, MAKES YOU THINK WHY? BECAUSE SOMETIMES THEY ARE TOLD TO PAY MORE THEN THEY CAN AFFORD? WHEN DO _WE_ GET A CHANCE AT LIFE? WHY IS CHILD SUPPORT A LIFE SENTENCE THESE DAYS? HOW CAN THE GOVERNMENT OPENLY ADMIT AND GET AWAY WITH DOUBLE DIPPING PARENTS? WHEN IS ENOUGH, JUST PLAIN ENOUGH? SEEMS TO ME SOME OF THE CUSTODIAL PARENTS OUT THERE ARE THE TRUE ABUSERS IN SOME SITUATIONS? NOT TO SAY THAT SOME PEOPLE DONT ACTUALLY NEED IT BUT IT NEEDS TO BE MORE _FAIR_!!!! Please visit: http://childsupportunfair.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly Why did you repeat the same thing?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"SpiderHam77" wrote in message
oups.com... Exactly Why did you repeat the same thing? Because he's an idiot. His other addresses are in my kilfile. Looks like it's time to update his list of aliases.. again. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Well thats a good enough reason in my Books...
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Dusty" wrote in Because he's an idiot. His other addresses are in my kilfile. Looks like it's time to update his list of aliases.. again. Who is this guy? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Of course you can say im an idiot, you are obviously ignorant, instead
to think that PERHAPS I had a technical difficulty and the same thing was just reposted when I hit submit again... Hmm Maybe??? Please dont waste my time or yours showing me how ignorant you really are... Plus trying to pretend like you know something.... Mc Donalds might be hiring? Check into that.. Next... about the bill splitting... tried that and when she admitted in OPEN COURT she wanted the money to pay for an SUV, the judge said she does not have to spend the money on the children and she does not have to justify her spending and awarded her the money any ways... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why should she have to justify her spending habits to you... If all
the bills are paid.. And your child is cared for... who cares where the money goes... I would not be require to justify where I put the money that My Ex Wife would pay me if she ever did... As all the money gets put into a big Pile and it really doesn't matter whoes money pays what.. as long as everything gets paid.. Now if you have an issue of her not paying her Bills in order to care for your child.. then thats a different story... And you could apply for Custody of your children and make her pay you then. SpiderHam77 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"SpiderHam77" wrote in message ups.com... Why should she have to justify her spending habits to you... If all the bills are paid.. And your child is cared for... who cares where the money goes... I would not be require to justify where I put the money that My Ex Wife would pay me if she ever did... As all the money gets put into a big Pile and it really doesn't matter whoes money pays what.. as long as everything gets paid.. If you give the grocer a $20 bill and he gives you a pack of gum, who cares where the money goes. You paid your fee and got your gum. See the problem? Now if you have an issue of her not paying her Bills in order to care for your child.. then thats a different story... And you could apply for Custody of your children and make her pay you then. Oh yeah, judges are just chomping at the bit to turn custody to fathers, that's why fewer than 2 out of 10 men get custody (after either spending tons of money to get what mothers are given freely or the mother choosing to give up custody). :^ You are either completely unknowledgeable about how custody actually works in the RW or your are simply trying to spread disinformation. After reading your posts for a few days, it appears to me that 1) you are a woman with custody despite your stating otherwise; 2) you are trying to defend a lie, that C$ has something to do with supporting children. Phil #3 SpiderHam77 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT The "Child's" Point Of View | Pop | Foster Parents | 7 | June 20th 05 03:13 AM |
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Foster Parents | 3 | December 8th 03 11:53 PM |
| Ex Giants player sentenced-DYFS wrkr no harm noticed | Kane | Foster Parents | 10 | September 16th 03 11:59 AM |
Helping Your Child Be Healthy and Fit sX3#;WA@'U | John Smith | Kids Health | 0 | July 20th 03 04:50 AM |