If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Ventura Boo-Hoos Over Media Witch Hunt For Questioning 9/11
Vandar wrote:
SgtMinor wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , SgtMinor wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , 127.0.0.1 wrote: Iarnrod wrote: Somebody call the Wahhhh-mbulance for this klown. How Gravity Acts Sir Isaac Newton noticed, centuries ago, that apples fell (down! never up...) from trees. Lots of others, before him, had also noticed this, The purported "gravitational collapse" (video) of World Trade Center building 7, which was hit by zero aircraft, and which also vertically collapsed in within a second of free-fall-time-in-a-vacuum later that same day, similarly fails this same conservation-of-energy analysis. You are wrong by a couple thousand ft. WTC7 was 610 ft. tall. Free fall from that height would be 6.10 seconds. As shown in the video, WTC7 collapsed in 12-15 seconds. Free fall in that time would be a couple thousands feet higher. The final collapse of WTC7 was about 15 seconds by this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k6GMddY-lQ snip We have FOUR demolition experts that are on record saying that WTC was not a man-made demoliiton job and will explain why they think that: Ron Craig, Jowenko, and Loizeaux, and Blanchard. There are no demolition experts that say that WTC was man-made demolition. In this video, demolition expert Jowenko explains why WTC 1, 2 and 7 were NOT demolition jobs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQ...elated&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQ...elated&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDx...elated&search= http://jowenko.nl/ Actually, about WTC7, Danny Jowenko, in the final video you cited (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDx...lated&search=), says the exact opposite. He is convinced that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. In another video he claims it was done by a team of experts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI No such "team of experts" got into WTC7, or got out, either. ANd the ywould have needed tons of high explosives and related equipment. WTC7 was under close observation by firemen and structural engineers. It was on fire and showing signs of collapse. WTC7 was shown to be starting to collapse as early as 2PM. See [1], [7], and [8], below. I don't care. I'm just telling you that Jowenko says the exact opposite of what you claim. And Dr. Bill Frist incorrectly diagnosed Terry Schiavo by looking at one video as well. Tell that to Al Dykes. He's the one using Jowenko to support his claims. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Ventura Boo-Hoos Over Media Witch Hunt For Questioning 9/11
SgtMinor wrote:
Vandar wrote: SgtMinor wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , SgtMinor wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , 127.0.0.1 wrote: Iarnrod wrote: Somebody call the Wahhhh-mbulance for this klown. How Gravity Acts Sir Isaac Newton noticed, centuries ago, that apples fell (down! never up...) from trees. Lots of others, before him, had also noticed this, The purported "gravitational collapse" (video) of World Trade Center building 7, which was hit by zero aircraft, and which also vertically collapsed in within a second of free-fall-time-in-a-vacuum later that same day, similarly fails this same conservation-of-energy analysis. You are wrong by a couple thousand ft. WTC7 was 610 ft. tall. Free fall from that height would be 6.10 seconds. As shown in the video, WTC7 collapsed in 12-15 seconds. Free fall in that time would be a couple thousands feet higher. The final collapse of WTC7 was about 15 seconds by this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k6GMddY-lQ snip We have FOUR demolition experts that are on record saying that WTC was not a man-made demoliiton job and will explain why they think that: Ron Craig, Jowenko, and Loizeaux, and Blanchard. There are no demolition experts that say that WTC was man-made demolition. In this video, demolition expert Jowenko explains why WTC 1, 2 and 7 were NOT demolition jobs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQ...elated&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQ...elated&search= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDx...elated&search= http://jowenko.nl/ Actually, about WTC7, Danny Jowenko, in the final video you cited (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QajDx...lated&search=), says the exact opposite. He is convinced that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. In another video he claims it was done by a team of experts: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgoSOQ2xrbI No such "team of experts" got into WTC7, or got out, either. ANd the ywould have needed tons of high explosives and related equipment. WTC7 was under close observation by firemen and structural engineers. It was on fire and showing signs of collapse. WTC7 was shown to be starting to collapse as early as 2PM. See [1], [7], and [8], below. I don't care. I'm just telling you that Jowenko says the exact opposite of what you claim. And Dr. Bill Frist incorrectly diagnosed Terry Schiavo by looking at one video as well. Tell that to Al Dykes. He's the one using Jowenko to support his claims. You said that Jowenko "is convinced that WTC7 was a controlled demolition". Frist was equally convinced that Terry Schiavo was aware of her surroundings. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constant questioning | Donna Metler | General | 7 | February 28th 08 05:27 AM |
Motion Questioning | Henry | Child Support | 58 | October 30th 07 05:13 PM |
CT: New Haven witch hunt for deadbeat fathers - notice that NO mothers were on their list... | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | April 5th 05 06:37 AM |
Missing in Ventura California | MeltnMetal | Solutions | 0 | December 17th 04 07:30 PM |
Questioning Doctor's advice. | karen hill | Pregnancy | 48 | January 16th 04 01:01 AM |