If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
This bill is a waste of time and money. The price of Amalgam is going
up by 30% so it is going to swing more dentists to use composite. Jason Johnson wrote: In article , "Robert" wrote: "C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. The same question applies to fluoridation. Robert ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PubMed Research Report: Italian Association for Metals and Biocompatibility Research (AIRMEB), Milan, Italy. Eighteen cadavers from routine autopsy casework were subject to a study of tissue levels of total mercury in brain, thyroid, and kidney samples by atomic absorption. On these same cadavers, all dental amalgam fillings (the most important source of inorganic mercury exposure in the general population, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) were charted. Total mercury levels were significantly higher in subjects with a greater number of occlusal amalgam surfaces (12) compared with those with fewer occlusal amalgams (0-3) in all types of tissue (all P or = 0.04). Mercury levels were significantly higher in brain tissues compared with thyroid and kidney tissues in subjects with more than 12 occlusal amalgam fillings (all P or = 0.01) but not in subjects with 3 or less occlusal amalgams (all P or = 0.07). PMID: 16501347 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Related Links * Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. [J Prosthet Dent. 1987] PMID: 3480359 * [Study on the significance of mercury accumulation in the brain from dental amalgam fillings through direct mouth-nose-brain transport] [Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996] PMID: 9376055 * Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury. [J Am Dent Assoc. 1999] PMID: 10036842 * The distribution of mercury in various tissues of guinea-pigs after application of dental amalgam fillings (a pilot study). [Sci Total Environ. 1987] PMID: 3685953 * Determination of mercury in blood, urine and saliva for the biological monitoring of an exposure from amalgam fillings in a group with self-reported adverse health effects. [Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002] PMID: 12040918 * See all Related Articles... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
In article ,
Mark Probert wrote: Peter Bowditch wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Good point. I understand that the alternatives to amalgams take longer to use, and, do not last as long. That's not quite true -- gold lasts longer. But it's a lot more expensive. Best solution: brush at least twice per day, use fluoridated toothpaste, and floss. Dental sealants for the kids are also a good idea. The cheapest filling is the one you never get. Too bad Gohde wasn't able to follow this natural practice. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me." -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Jan Drew" wrote in message ... http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Good. I don't know how it will go, but I have doubts it will pass. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
We should have a bill to ban typewriters now that we have computers.
Vernon wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote in message ... http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Good. I don't know how it will go, but I have doubts it will pass. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Jan Drew" wrote in message om... "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? I saw that first hand amd ALL over my body. *I* was mercury poisoned by Mercury Amalgams. Do know what you are talking abour before posting, please. *I* have posted the about for years! How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Depends on the person. See my MANY postings!! Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. For sure--YOU do not know the health effects. "Jan Drew" wrote in message om... "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Mark Probert" wrote in message ... Peter Bowditch wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Good point. Another all about $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. I understand that the alternatives to amalgams take longer to use, and, do not last as long. YOU do NOT understand. Using a simple business model, patients and insurance companies will have to come up with more money to pay for non-amalgam restorations. While people can and are P O I S O N E D!! What happened to your UDP?? I knew you could NOT do it. Don't you read what you post? This bill could be rightly called the Dentist Full Employment Act. By YOU--DISHONEST!! The bill if FACT has the rightfully name. Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Alexander Vasserman DDS" wrote in message oups.com... This bill is a waste of time and money. No, the bill is not a waste of time. In fact mercury amalgams should have never been used. The first dentists to use them were call QUACKS. Then came the LYING ADA and *organized medcine* seeing a way to make $$$$. NOT caring what the risks were. FACT: The ADA got caught LYING--saying amalgams did not leak. Then they made up a new LIE saying the low levels were not dangerous. Studies have shown that to be a BLATANT LIE. Adverse health effects have been documented. They were and are denied, The general public has no idea what is going in their mouth, they have been DISHONESTLY taught to trust dentists--like YOU. Who care nothing about people--just their EGO. There has never been ONE single study porving them to be safe. FACT: They are NOT. The price of Amalgam is going up by 30% so it is going to swing more dentists to use composite. That should not be the reason for the so-called swing. People are searching and suffering--NEEDLESS. All because of these LIES. Jason Johnson wrote: In article , "Robert" wrote: "C.J. Thomas" wrote in message ... Jan, I also have a question for you. When are we going to see all the research demonstrating the negative side-effects of amalgam fillings on actual people who have had fillings in their mouths for the past 40-50 years? How long does it take for toxicity to present itself? Surely, people are going to start dropping like flies. The same question applies to fluoridation. Robert ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PubMed Research Report: Italian Association for Metals and Biocompatibility Research (AIRMEB), Milan, Italy. Eighteen cadavers from routine autopsy casework were subject to a study of tissue levels of total mercury in brain, thyroid, and kidney samples by atomic absorption. On these same cadavers, all dental amalgam fillings (the most important source of inorganic mercury exposure in the general population, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) were charted. Total mercury levels were significantly higher in subjects with a greater number of occlusal amalgam surfaces (12) compared with those with fewer occlusal amalgams (0-3) in all types of tissue (all P or = 0.04). Mercury levels were significantly higher in brain tissues compared with thyroid and kidney tissues in subjects with more than 12 occlusal amalgam fillings (all P or = 0.01) but not in subjects with 3 or less occlusal amalgams (all P or = 0.07). PMID: 16501347 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Related Links * Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. [J Prosthet Dent. 1987] PMID: 3480359 * [Study on the significance of mercury accumulation in the brain from dental amalgam fillings through direct mouth-nose-brain transport] [Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1996] PMID: 9376055 * Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury. [J Am Dent Assoc. 1999] PMID: 10036842 * The distribution of mercury in various tissues of guinea-pigs after application of dental amalgam fillings (a pilot study). [Sci Total Environ. 1987] PMID: 3685953 * Determination of mercury in blood, urine and saliva for the biological monitoring of an exposure from amalgam fillings in a group with self-reported adverse health effects. [Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002] PMID: 12040918 * See all Related Articles... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! I know it's difficult, but try to think. If amalgams are banned, dentists will make a lot more money. That is why it is a good thing for dentists. You just said *excellent news* for dentists. Read what I said again and you will see that I was talking about a world without amalgam fillings. NO, you did not! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. What a laugh! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. Does Dentist Jerome (blessed be His name) offer consent forms when he is going to fill teeth with possibly toxic chemicals? FACT: He asked for a compatability test. But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. So are you. That is a BLATANT LIE. You want them to use a more expensive 9and profitable) repair material. Prove that, LIAR! I want them banned for very good reason. Have you have mercury poisoning for amalgams, Pete? The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch REPEATING LIES AND SPAM. You are a proven liar. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced
"cathyb" wrote in message oups.com... Peter Bowditch wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: "Peter Bowditch" wrote: "Jan Drew" wrote: http://www.talkinternational.com Bill for Banning Amalgam Reintroduced A bill for banning amalgam dental fillings has been (re)introduced to the house by Congresswoman Diane Watson. The bill is HR 4011. Congresswoman Watson's staff has encouraged us to get behind the bill and has asked the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to have its members contact their local representatives. We also strongly encourage the public to also do so. Please let them hear your voice! Excellent news for dentists. I see you are for dentists. NOT the people--including children who could and are P O I S O N E D!! I know it's difficult, but try to think. If amalgams are banned, dentists will make a lot more money. That is why it is a good thing for dentists. Read what I said again and you will see that I was talking about a world without amalgam fillings. You are *such* an optimist, Peter. Peter is a PROVEN liar, Proven deceiver--and SPAMMER. Just like YOU!! If amalgams are banned there will be tens of billions of dollars going into dentists' pockets. Some dentists are STILL using them. WITHOUT warning of the risks. Neither CONSENT forms. Does Dentist Jerome (blessed be His name) offer consent forms when he is going to fill teeth with possibly toxic chemicals? But--YOU are all for $$$$$$ going to dentists. So are you. You want them to use a more expensive 9and profitable) repair material. The general public has no clue what is going in their mouth. This comes from the LIES of *organized medicine and dentistry*. What a laugh! A pity you think it is funny! Very telliing! LIAR AND SPAMMER! -- Peter Bowditch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dozens of Chemicals Found in Most Americans' Bodies | Kids Health | 26 | August 12th 06 02:29 AM | |
Vaccine quote of the week by Bernard Rimland, PhD | john | Kids Health | 164 | July 28th 06 02:59 PM |
Vaccine quote of the week by Bernard Rimland, PhD | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 12 | July 22nd 06 10:45 PM |
MERCK'S GARDASIL VACCINE NOT PROVEN SAFE FOR LITTLE GIRLS | Bryan Heit | Kids Health | 12 | July 7th 06 12:18 PM |
Personal perspective: new era of consumer protection possible in USA, if legislature acts on aspartame ban, Stephen Fox, 49 citizen comments, Leland Lehrman: Murray 2006.01.21 | Rich Murray | Kids Health | 0 | January 22nd 06 04:01 AM |