If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Midwives and my birth/story
Piggybacking; I missed the original somehow
"Karen" wrote in message ... My comments: - not such a good idea to head straight to the hospital after your water breaks if there are no contractions. Chances are awfully good that for a first baby, it isn't going to just appear from nowhere if there are no contractions! I'd wait many, many hours to see if labor starts on its own before heading to the hospital. Ah, but practitioners routinely advise women to come to the hospital as soon as their water breaks, contractions or no contractions. And the reason they do it is, in part, to rule out a cord prolapse, which is life-threatening and is a risk when your water breaks if the baby is not engaged. In this situation, I would personally try to check *myself* to verify that a prolapse hadn't occurred and wait it out, but women are simply following the instructions they're issued when they dutifully appear at the hospital after ROM. It's unfortunate that practitioners then feel the need to induce labor, though, given that there's no evidence that it does any good in the absence of GBS+ status or unknown GBS status and ROM for 18+ hours, but having got the woman to the hospital, I suppose they feel a bit nervous about sending her back home to wait, especially if it's a first baby. - 18 hours from beginning to end for a first baby is average, maybe a little less, for a first baby. For my first, it was around 25 hours. I felt that was pretty good! For a pitocin-induced labor, though, it's very long (they generally administer the pitocin with the aim of generating a labor of roughly 8-12 hours in duration), and she *pushed* for over 4 hours, if I read right. That's a very long time to be in the *hospital* hooked up to everything in God's creation while laboring with pitocin-induced contractions that may come on considerably more strongly and painfully than spontaneous contractions. My pitocin-induced labor was a mere 8 hours from start to finish while my second, spontaneous labor was 28+ hours (90 minutes in the hospital) and I can tell with certainty that the 28+ hour labor was much easier to cope with. 18 hours being induced with pitocin is my idea of hell on earth. But I see you've had the experience, so you know. I don't think Jill did anything she shouldn't have done except, perhaps, have a little too much faith in medication's ability to make her birth completely pain-free. But that's not particularly unusual: I daresay it's what the *majority* of women hope for (we're just a bit of an odd contingent here on mkp!). -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Sin (Vernon, 2), Misery (Aurora, 4), and the Rising Son (Julian, 6) Aurora (in the bathroom with her dad)--"It looks like an elephant, Daddy." Me (later)--"You should feel flattered." All opinions expressed in this post are well-reasoned and insightful. Needless to say, they are not those of my Internet Service Provider, its other subscribers or lackeys. Anyone who says otherwise is itchin' for a fight. -- with apologies to Michael Feldman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'Midwives...encourage...semisitting' (Yale CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | April 29th 04 04:33 PM |
Georgetown U. Hospital firing their midwives | Alpha | Pregnancy | 2 | April 8th 04 03:20 PM |
Odent on forceps (also: midwives 'prisoners of protocol') | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | March 1st 04 05:59 AM |
Midwives, Doulas, and Wal-mart | zeldabee | Pregnancy | 5 | August 2nd 03 10:47 PM |
Midwives getting practical experience | andrea | Pregnancy | 3 | July 28th 03 06:15 PM |