If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Alfred Cutner
Alfred S Cutner, Gyneacologist practicing at UCHL, Portland & King Edward iiv Hospitals. On 26th April I was reviewed and placed on waiting list for surgery by a member of the team of the above. A recommendation was made at that consultation that I see a haematologist but no referral was ever made. Despite recommendation I discontinue medication 6 weeks prior to surgery, I was given 4 weeks notice before admission. A pre-op assessment never took place, partly because my notes had not arrived and the very young member of the team I saw on that occasion didn't really seem to know what to do. The pre-op assessment nurse I saw made very inappropriate personal comments and sabotaged the whole admission by not carrying out all the necessary tests, made the whole process extremely difficult and even on the day of admission, 2nd July manipulated events in such a way that necessary tests could not be carried out and the necessary prep could not be carried out. UCHL is still refusing to release her name to me as it is necessary to report her to the UK Nursing and Midwifery Council as she is more than likely to harm other patients that are being subjected to her, given the abuse she subjected me to. On arrival on the ward, her deceit quickly became known; a bed had only come available at 3 pm where she claimed she had rung me at 1 pm to say a bed had become available. To make matters worse, patient confidentiality was breached in a serious way on several occasions. When I spoke to nurse in charge of ward concerning this, he corrected what he could and raised the issue during the next handover, resulting in key nurse turning extremely hostile. When treating surgeon came to see me prior to surgery, these issues were raised as well as the fact that I was feeling extremely unwell. This resulted in the immediate accusation that I was not psychologically ready for surgery. Normal protocol is that physical concerns are investigated before even alluring to "psychological issues". Certainly where it is evident that not all necessary tests etc have been carried out. Needless to say, surgery was cancelled and I was told by key nurse that "the bed was needed" before she walked away. I could not even have so much as a cup of tea after two days fasting and having the surgery I'd been waiting for for 7 years cancelled through no fault of my own. The next day I received an outpatient appointment for in 6 months time. Initially I made a complaint, both to complaints department and doctor; I then asked for it to be temporarily suspended if there could be a meeting with treating surgeon to resolve outstanding issues - which never materialized - as well as appointment being brought forward which was done. In the meantime, because by then three doctors had recommended I see a haematologist, all of whom failed to refer me, I was left with no option but to see one privately as I was really feeling ill. This care is normally available on the NHS but was not being made available to me. Being on Income Support, I obviously can not afford this but reimbursement is not forthcoming as yet. The results of the clinical tests carried out were very worrying; even then, I was very concerned that these would provoke professional embarrassment given the accusation of "psychologically not being ready" for surgery, despite the fact that all the clinical indications make this surgery of extreme urgency and exceptional need. In the meeting intended to resolve outstanding issues, nothing was resolved, primarily through the presence of Alfred Cutner who had no intention to resolve outstanding matters whatsoever, while other issues were resolved between treating surgeon and myself. Then came a letter from Alfred Cutner accusing me of lying about test results ( despite a formal report by haematologist giving as diagnosis primary APS - no monkey snot! ) dated 17th October and implying I didn't want the surgery. In said meeting he also openly accused me of wasting time and resources. A very inappropriate remark to make in any circumstances, especially in mine. Alfred Cutner also intended to make a in house referral to a general physician to oversee general health matters, thereby stating that in house referrals can be made - so why not the recommended referral to haematologist that was needed presumably before surgery could be undertaken? I was also accused of faking symptoms of a serious illness - primary APS aka Hughes Syndrome - to get out of the surgery! That was the final straw and I defended myself against these accusations. Immediately I was removed from the waiting list for surgery which is getting more urgent by the day. On five occasions have I tried to resolve issues, none of which were of my making except the way I complained to treating surgeon about events in July and these were resolved between him and myself. The person supposed tto mediate between Alfred Cutner and myself made a set of statements to me in opne week and stated completely the opposite the week after; she has not even tried to amicably mediate and resolve the situation. Despite removing ( on 25ht October) me from his list for fully funded surgery, Alfred Cutner has not referred me on as a matter of urgency to another doctor to be treated as priority - normal protocol - given I've been on waiting list since April 2006 and due for surgery in July 2006 in the same hospital. I find myself once again without the prospect of any treatment at all, however urgent as at extreme risk of both developing cancer as well as needing to come off all hormones given the objective clinical diagnosis of primary APS. Before the reader considers to accept Alfred Cutner as doctor, he is advised to consider · The total lack of care condoned by Alfred Cutner · Breach of patient confidentiality condoned by Alfred Cutner · Acting against best interest of his patients. · Acting against patients health and welfare · Denial of the right to appropriate treatment · Denial of the right to treatment full stop. · Whether he wants to accept unfounded accusations. · To have a doctor happy to operate without being fully aware of all the clinical conditions. · To have a doctor happy to operate without investigating any possibly clinical conditions when being made aware of them. · Not forward a patient to another doctor despite exceptional clinical need based on personal dislike and professional embarrassment. · Leave you in limbo for months on end with total disregard for personal loss incurred, financially, professionally and personally. · To remain ill to a greater degree through the refusal of treatment for longer than necessary. · Whether a dishonest, unjust, vindictive, greedy, power-madman malicious liar is a doctor you would choose to be "treated" by? On the NHS or privately? Anyone else been the victim of Alfred S Cutner? Anyone wishes to? I am still awaiting the release of the names of the 2 nurses to report to the UK Nursing and Midwifery Council which the hospital refuses to release to me. Update I am now in possession of the opinion of another Consultant Gyneacologist who writes: "Firstly, i am convinced that there are good medical grounds for a total hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy." Meaning that there is no elective element in having this procedure done. This letter is dated 14/12/07 As have several doctors said, and that since 2004, "exceptional clinical need to have this procedure done." So far, I've not even had a pre-op assessment yet Alfred Cutner was perfectly happy to cut me open without it, despite my age, angina and polycythaemia; add to this primary APS which should and could have been picked up prior to operation date of 3rd July 2007. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Alfred C. Kinsey: Nazi Pedophile Collaborator, | R. Steve Walz | Solutions | 0 | September 21st 07 04:48 PM |
Alfred C. Kinsey: Nazi Pedophile Collaborator, | David[_4_] | Solutions | 0 | September 21st 07 04:29 PM |
No sick hats jump Lisette, and they inadvertently explain Alfred too. | edward ohare | General | 0 | June 27th 06 10:51 AM |
Black African Niggaboos, the strong jug rarely recollects Alfred, it lives Penny instead, Deaf Fruitcake. | Robert McClenon | General | 0 | June 27th 06 08:00 AM |
Kevin Alfred Strom | Brian Betsworth | Child Support | 0 | June 25th 03 09:20 PM |