If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
Greegor wrote:
Greegor wrote: Exhibit A. Direct question Kane wrote You advised someone to commit a crime? No? Exhibit B. Direct and complete answer Greg wrote No. It already existed when she asked for help. Exhibit C. Characterization of Exhibit B. Kane wrote You are dodging. That is not the issue...when? Exhibit D. Attempt to change what "the issue" is Kane wrote The issue is that you advised her to use that crime to challenge the court in the middle of a child protection case. Kane wrote (About Exhibit D.) Absolutely. This IS the issue. Then how do you explain your exact words in Exhibit A? How do you explain your attempt to change "the issue" between Exhibit A and Exhibit D? Greg you can't, because of your limited capabilities, properly debate an issue here or in Court or in a Motion to the Court. The last five years and ten months are a testament to that fact. Just a suggestion, but the next time you jump into a dumpster for the bottles and cans... do the world a favor and stay there. Dan, You say I am incapable of debate. Then all you do is ad hominem. Short on dazzling logic? Did you miss this part? "Greg you can't, because of your limited capabilities, properly debate an issue here or in Court or in a Motion to the Court. The last five years and ten months are a testament to that fact." He is pointing YOU don't debate. That IS a valid topic OF debate. And elegantly logical. You have done nothing but dodge, not debate. The opponent's (us) challenge has been made. The suspect perp, YOU, have refused to answer the challenges made. What more is their to do but remind you of it until you do answer, or you simply go on with dodges like the above? No, Greg, the lab rat, there IS no way out of this one. Every thread with you in it is fair game for restating the challenge, and pointing out you have dodged yet again. Every subject other than two, at this point, the proof of your accusation of a "computer felony" and the proof that telling someone to challenge the court by admitting to a crime in the course of a child welfare trial, a CIVIL trial at that, is a valid way for someone to get their children back. Show us a single instance, ONE instance, where someone committed a crime and did in fact thereby get their children back from CPS. And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. "Brain should have pulled the trigger." Remember? And remember your argument with the cop that objected to the use of lethal force? Answer the challenges Greg. Or run. You are just another thug only too cowardly to act....like your coward friends you want others to be your lab rats and then when they lose, your excuse for yourself because "CPS is evil." 0:- |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
Greegor wrote:
Dan Sullivan wrote: Dan, You say I am incapable of debate. Then all you do is ad hominem. Greg wrote Short on dazzling logic? Dan wrote Not at all. You must have overlooked this the first time. Greg you can't, because of your limited capabilities, properly debate an issue here or in Court or in a Motion to the Court. The last five years and ten months are a testament to that fact. Please try to rescue Kane from this one! Show us your masterful logic! Kane got caught between Exhibit A, Exhibit D and comments about Exhibiut D. Can you argue without ad hom (arguing to the man)? Show us how you dazzle those caseworkers with logic, Dan! Greegor wrote: Exhibit A. Direct question Kane wrote You advised someone to commit a crime? No? Exhibit B. Direct and complete answer Greg wrote No. It already existed when she asked for help. Exhibit C. Characterization of Exhibit B. Kane wrote You are dodging. That is not the issue...when? Exhibit D. Attempt to change what "the issue" is Kane wrote The issue is that you advised her to use that crime to challenge the court in the middle of a child protection case. Kane wrote (About Exhibit D.) Absolutely. This IS the issue. Greg wrote Then how do you explain your exact words in Exhibit A? How do you explain your attempt to change "the issue" between Exhibit A and Exhibit D? You want to be careful about trying to use an "Exact words" argument Greg. Next time I might not be so generous in excusing your exact words, and allow you explain what you meant...and that it didn't mean you believed in the use of lethal force against caseworkers. It's not a "change." It's an explanation of what I meant. Just as you were allowed to say you had NOT meant to mean lethal force was okay...after I asked for over two years before you finally got the message. How can you explain that you still refuse to answer the actual challenge, other than by a sick little dodge, that you told someone to take a chance getting arrested on criminal charges during a civil trial and risk losing her children? Any time now, Greg. Or run again. Up to you. 0:- |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
Kane wrote
And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. My buddies? Who exactly are you referring to? You're blaming me for something "my buddies" said?? About an incident from YEARS ago? "Brain should have pulled the trigger." Remember? Is THAT what you said? And remember your argument with the cop that objected to the use of lethal force? You're quoting it wrong. What was the FAKE cops name? "Oliver Sutton"?? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
"Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
George Truro wrote:
"Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
"0:-" wrote in message news9WdnbpCBZ86W8TYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@scnresearch. com... George Truro wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. You're not too ****in bright are ya Butch?? And your reading comprehension needs some work too. Wanna try again. Go back and start all over? Ok - It was Federal Agents that instigated ther Cristine fiasco - Can I be any clearer?? Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
George Truro wrote: "0:-" wrote in message news9WdnbpCBZ86W8TYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@scnresearch. com... George Truro wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. You're not too ****in bright are ya Butch?? And your reading comprehension needs some work too. Wanna try again. Go back and start all over? Ok - It was Federal Agents that instigated ther Cristine fiasco - Federal agents? From what federal agency, and could you provide some supporting evidence, by link please? Can I be any clearer?? Yes. As it is you are blowing way too much smoke out your ass and none of us are interested in it going up ours. But you once again, Troll, have given us the opportunity to bring more clarity to the Christine case and just WHO the real perps were in causing them to make the errors they did. Were I one of you ****ants, when Brian gets out, I'd be hittin' the highroad, because I think he's very intelligent, and with enough time to think...as he has...he'll figure out just who LAB RATTED HIM. Run suckers, run. 0:- Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
"0:-" wrote in message ups.com... George Truro wrote: "0:-" wrote in message news9WdnbpCBZ86W8TYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@scnresearch. com... George Truro wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. You're not too ****in bright are ya Butch?? And your reading comprehension needs some work too. Wanna try again. Go back and start all over? Ok - It was Federal Agents that instigated ther Cristine fiasco - Federal agents? From what federal agency, and could you provide some supporting evidence, by link please? You've accused Greg and his 'buddies' of instigating violence. You provide some proof. Or are you falsely accusing again. The great NW has 2 agents for every citizen - folks flocking there to join these anti-gov groups are about as dim as dim can be - there are no anti-gov groups in the NW that aren't run by the Feds!! FBI agents and/or imformants instigated Brian to violence he would never have committed without theirinstigation. Can I be any clearer?? Yes. As it is you are blowing way too much smoke out your ass and none of us are interested in it going up ours. But you once again, Troll, have given us the opportunity to bring more clarity to the Christine case and just WHO the real perps were in causing them to make the errors they did. Were I one of you ****ants, when Brian gets out, I'd be hittin' the highroad, because I think he's very intelligent, and with enough time to think...as he has...he'll figure out just who LAB RATTED HIM. Run suckers, run. 0:- Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
George Truro wrote:
"0:-" wrote in message ups.com... George Truro wrote: "0:-" wrote in message news9WdnbpCBZ86W8TYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@scnresearch. com... George Truro wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. You're not too ****in bright are ya Butch?? And your reading comprehension needs some work too. Wanna try again. Go back and start all over? Ok - It was Federal Agents that instigated ther Cristine fiasco - Federal agents? From what federal agency, and could you provide some supporting evidence, by link please? You've accused Greg and his 'buddies' of instigating violence. Yep. You provide some proof. Nope. It was in the news. Likely archived in media morgues by now and requiring paid subscriptions to access. Those that followed the story know the truth. Brian didn't get the idea of using a gun all by his little lonesome. Or are you falsely accusing again. Never have, stupid. The great NW has 2 agents for every citizen - folks flocking there to join these anti-gov groups are about as dim as dim can be - there are no anti-gov groups in the NW that aren't run by the Feds!! You seem to be a nice honest fellow that requires proof. How about you provide some? FBI agents and/or imformants instigated Brian to violence he would never have committed without theirinstigation. Identify them please, with proof. As you've said, you are just a troll, so your word is useless. Trolls will say what they will to get attention, being frustrated narcissists in the real world, where they are afraid to babble their mindless attention getting bull****. Can I be any clearer?? Yes. As it is you are blowing way too much smoke out your ass and none of us are interested in it going up ours. But you once again, Troll, have given us the opportunity to bring more clarity to the Christine case and just WHO the real perps were in causing them to make the errors they did. Were I one of you ****ants, when Brian gets out, I'd be hittin' the highroad, because I think he's very intelligent, and with enough time to think...as he has...he'll figure out just who LAB RATTED HIM. Like I said, Run suckers, run. 0:- And thanks once MORE, troll. You like having your little leash jerked on do you? R R R R R R R ... you are mine, stupid. All mine, and I'll use you every time you post here. Fancy that, eh? 0:- Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Kane CAUGHT at false accusation and deception
"0:-" wrote in message ... George Truro wrote: "0:-" wrote in message ups.com... George Truro wrote: "0:-" wrote in message news9WdnbpCBZ86W8TYnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@scnresearch. com... George Truro wrote: "Greegor" wrote in message oups.com... Kane wrote And when you sort all this out, if you ever do, lame of brain, consider apologizing to Brian and Ruth for the havoc YOUR buddies ran on them and their children. Only the lame of brain believe citizens influenced this decision. It's not citizens but Federal Agencies who have a history of inciting violence. The Christine's case was most certainly instigated to violence by Agents not citizens. Then you'd be one of those Oregon buddies of the Christines that incited Brian to point a gun at his children. Isn't that right? If you think he didn't, you don't know a damn thing about handguns and field of fire in a shootout even at close range. You're not too ****in bright are ya Butch?? And your reading comprehension needs some work too. Wanna try again. Go back and start all over? Ok - It was Federal Agents that instigated ther Cristine fiasco - Federal agents? From what federal agency, and could you provide some supporting evidence, by link please? You've accused Greg and his 'buddies' of instigating violence. Yep. You provide some proof. Nope. It was in the news. Likely archived in media morgues by now and requiring paid subscriptions to access. You are a liar. Greg Hanson never appeared in news stories about Brian and Ruth. Those that followed the story know the truth. I followed the story - and I know you are a liar making false accusations - just as CPS trained you. Brian didn't get the idea of using a gun all by his little lonesome. Your delusions that you can read peoples minds and know their thoughts and motives just shows how desperate you are to make **** up and blame it on someone. Or are you falsely accusing again. Never have, stupid. Of course you are - Greg had no part in Brian and Ruths case. Your accusations and insinuations are false. False accusations - the same kind you used to destroy folks when you worked for CPS. The great NW has 2 agents for every citizen - folks flocking there to join these anti-gov groups are about as dim as dim can be - there are no anti-gov groups in the NW that aren't run by the Feds!! You seem to be a nice honest fellow that requires proof. How about you provide some? Its been archived. I've posted it here numerous times. That CPS slime like you ignore the proof - its not my responsibility. You got a keyboard - look it up. FBI agents and/or imformants instigated Brian to violence he would never have committed without theirinstigation. Identify them please, with proof. The video and audio is still secret - as soon as we determine it safe for assholes like you to review I'll drop you an email. As you've said, you are just a troll, so your word is useless. Trolls will say what they will to get attention, being frustrated narcissists in the real world, where they are afraid to babble their mindless attention getting bull****. I've provided as much as you - so if it's true of me, it's true of you. Can I be any clearer?? Yes. As it is you are blowing way too much smoke out your ass and none of us are interested in it going up ours. But you once again, Troll, have given us the opportunity to bring more clarity to the Christine case and just WHO the real perps were in causing them to make the errors they did. Were I one of you ****ants, when Brian gets out, I'd be hittin' the highroad, because I think he's very intelligent, and with enough time to think...as he has...he'll figure out just who LAB RATTED HIM. Like I said, Run suckers, run. 0:- And thanks once MORE, troll. You like having your little leash jerked on do you? R R R R R R R ... you are mine, stupid. All mine, and I'll use you every time you post here. Fancy that, eh? 0:- Brian was stupid, his ONLY failing, really, and did things he shouldn't have that resulted in both abuse and dangerous medical neglect. He and Ruth were given EVERY chance to work out a plan for the return of their children, but all along the way, even from prior to the first removal of their children, YOU ****ants advised him to do things that were motivated by your desire to have the misery company loves so much, and to be lab rats for your failed political and personal agendas. Stick your lies back up your ass, stupid. 0:- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sodomy 101 | Greegor | Spanking | 48 | August 23rd 06 12:10 AM |
Arizona CPS Stealing Children for Profit: Angry parents Drop political equivalent of nuclear weapon at school board meeting.... | Greegor | Spanking | 0 | August 22nd 06 11:42 PM |
We don need no steenkin' CPS. | 0:-> | Spanking | 223 | July 19th 06 07:32 AM |
C$ paid, yet Judge orders prison time for not paying child support..?? | Dusty | Child Support | 267 | June 10th 06 04:36 PM |
Disinformation feed responded, now let's get to the truth.....Info please ... | Pohaku Kane | Foster Parents | 4 | November 27th 05 10:47 PM |