A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Birth stuff (also: Dr. Mal is part of God - chiropractically speaking)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 05, 05:55 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Birth stuff (also: Dr. Mal is part of God - chiropractically speaking)

BIRTH STUFF...

The reason for this post: Dr. Mal made the mistake of asking Todd: "What's
all that other stuff about."

PREGNANT WOMEN: Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and it's
easy for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%...

TO SAVE TIME: See the very end of this post.


I know this sounds bizarre but...

DR. MAL IS PART OF GOD - CHIROPRACTICALLY SPEAKING

We are ALL part of God - or so said the first chiropractor...

See the discussion of chiropractic's "Innate" "diagnostic trick" below.

"Malcolm & Nika" wrote in message
...
Oh Todd....you are a silly billy, (thats an endearing slang term not meant
to be offensive in any way),


Mal,

First of all, congratulations on the pregnancy - and I hope Nika's nausea is
better.

I *try* to be silly - sometimes it helps cut the tension generated by
persistently pointing out bizarre obstetric behavior that sometimes kills
babies.

I'm glad you asked, "what's all that other stuff about"...

For the short answer, see the very end of this post...

It wasn't me who started posting here...it was
them.


Sheesh, you sound like GOD - always here without "starting posting" here -
LOL!

You are part of God - chiropractically speaking.

See below.

Anyway never fear, having read the youthful looking Stefanos response
I will go sit quietly in the corner.
Incidently, I will still warn my
children/neighbours/friends not to act on something someone says on the
net.
Cant see the responses could be scientific anyway, it could be old men
with
nothing to do answering. There seems to be no control. Did you see the
stories about those children duped by adults into thinking they were
chatting with other kids?? Beter be safe than sorry......


I think you are going overboard - but your point is well-taken - we don't
know who's who in the zoo online.

We could all be little kids PRETENDING to be pregnant or interested in
pregnancy - LOL!

One poster recently suggested that all the women on misc.kids.pregnancy are
really men.

Either is possible - but I doubt it.

My sense is that Enquist et al. (including "the youthful looking Stefano")
are legitimate researchers.


Before I forget...whats all that other stuff about???


Well, like I told Enquist et al., obstetricians have a bizarre pregnancy
fetish...

By using semisitting and dorsal delivery positions, obstetricians are
closing birth canals up to 30% and keeping birth canals closed when babies
get stuck - and lying about it.

GREAT NEWS! Women can allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to
30% just by rolling onto their sides at delivery.

Simple, no?

ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY POSITIONS

Nearly ALL "alternative" delivery positions (kneeling, standing,
hands-and-knees, crouching-on-one knee, etc.) - nearly all of them allow the
birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%.

Women need to BEWA Some obstetricians and midwives will let women "try"
alternative delivery positions but move them back to semisitting or dorsal
(close their birth canal up to 30%) for the actual delivery.

And, of course, there is the fact that obstetricians routinely KEEP the
birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck (keep women
semisitting or dorsal as they pull with hands, forceps, vacuums)...

Mal...with the aproval of Nika. (Honest.)


Speaking of approval, Mal... Women shouldn't have to ASK/get the
obstetrician or midwife's approval for the "extra" up to 30% - that's just
the way it is - so I urge Nika to talk to her obstetrician or midwife today.

It would be far better if the REAL DOCTORS who read/lurk would take action
to stop obstetricians and midwives.

But that ain't going to happen real soon I don't think - they are afraid to
rock the medical trough.

PS: Are you really a doctor?
PPS: of what?


LOL! We are ALL doctors - we are all REAL doctors - in the sense that the
word doctor derives from the Latin word for teacher.

I am a doctor of chiropractic - author of the definition of chiropractic in
Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary [1988, 1994, 2000]: "chiropractic:
a science of applied neurophysiologic diagnosis...disease is caused my
noxious mechanical, chemical and/or psychic irritants and treatment is their
removal by the most conservative means possible."

EDUCATION of women and medical doctors (NON-SPINAL adjusting of noxious
"psychic" irritants/subluxations) is the most conservative means possible of
removing noxious mechanical irritants - stopping obstetricians from engaging
in gruesome spinal manipulation of most babies at birth - or so I say.

Incidentally, Dr. DD Palmer, the Founder of chiropractic, was very
interested in non-spinal adjusting. He subtitled his 1910 text "The
Chiropractor's Adjuster" and said "Chiropractic came as an educator."

Dr. Palmer NAMED chiropractic - in part - "the mental act of accumulating
knowledge." [1910:19]

This last only seems hubris until one realizes that medicine is RESTRICTING
the mental act of accumulating knowledge, as in,

WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS BALD LIE

"The most widely used and often the most satisfactory...[delivery position]
is...dorsal lithotomy...in order to increase the diameter of the pelvic
outlet." [Williams Obstetrics 2001:316]

The authors of Williams Obstetrics KNEW this was a bald lie when they
published it - because - beginning in 1993 - at my request - they published
the simple grisly biomechanics too, as in,

"[T]he increase in the diameter of the pelvic outlet occurs *only* if the
sacrum is not forced anteriorly by the weight of the maternal pelvis against
the delivery table or bed." [Williams Obsetrics 2001:55]

Dorsal lithotomy - also known as the "dorso-sacral" position - forces the
sacrum anteriorly - CLOSES the pelvic outlet up to 30%.

Semisitting - another common medical delivery position - also forces the
sacrum anteriorly and closes the pelvic outlet up to 30%.

The simple biomechanics have been in the medical literature since early last
century.

Harvard obstetrician Arthur B Emmons, MD wrote in 1913:

"[M]oving backward of the tip of the sacrum...enlarges the
available space not merely directly in proportion to the distance backward,
but more nearly by the square of that distance." [Emmons, AB. A study of the
variations in the female pelvis, based on observations made on 217 specimens
of the
American Indian squaw. Biometrika 1913; 9:34-47.]

Mal, I urge you to make sure that no one closes Nika's birth canal the
"extra" up to 30%.

Your tiny son or daughter needs that "extra" room - so does Nika.

Like most of the healing artists before him, Dr. DD Palmer, Founder of
chiropractic, posited a spiritual force - a God.

Then again, Dr. Palmer also said: "Worship truth and justice, you need no
other God."

Go figure...

Everyone is a real doctor - a doctor of chiropractic - when it comes to
teaching truth.

This is not to say that doctors of chiropractic only teach truth - they
don't - for example - there is no scientific evidence for the secondary
chiropractic hypothesis that vertebral subluxations exist and cause disease
and stop causing disease when they are adjusted...

Yet you will find doctors of chiropractic who will say there is such
scientific evidence.

I myself BELIEVE that vertebral subluxations exist and cause disease, etc. -
I adjusted many spines and saw many people get better - and not just from
back pain - it's just that there just isn't any scientific evidence (that I
know of - if someone knows of some - please post it).

First and foremost, all doctors (including doctors of chiropractic) take
action to PREVENT that which their profession charges to treat.

Everyone knows that - but medical doctors are reluctant because immediately
ending the obvious criminal negligence is tantamount to admitting it - which
is why I favor pardons in advance for MDs. As med students, MDs are TRAINED
to perform the felonies.

My fellow doctors of chiropractic are silent - well - I'm just guessing -
but I think it's because they don't want to rock the medical trough they are
finally feeding at...

Todd

PS The MDs called their God "vis medicatrix naturae" I think.

Dr. Palmer called his God force "Universal Intelligence" - with each of us
having a "personified portion" thereof called "Innate." (I humorously
suggested that you sound like God above. As on the subject line, from the
Founder's perspective, you *are* God - or part therof. We all are.)

Innate is a useful "diagnostic trick"/assumption...

Since Innate is always there irritating the nervous system to cause health
("Innate forwards the same impulses in health and disease")...

If someone is sick, the doctor of chiropractic looks for noxious mechanical,
chemical and/or psychic irritants - and removes them.

Most doctors of chiropractic focus on adjusting hypothetical SECONDARY
noxious mechanical irritants called "vertebral subluxations."

I focus on adjusting PRIMARY noxious irritants - primary noxious PSYCHIC
irritants - LIES.

As noted above, the authors of Williams Obstetrics KNEW that dorsal closes
when in 2001 they repeated their lie that dorsal widens.

I *know* they knew because I told them - and they published "my"
biomechanics in 1993.

They had to have known BEFORE I told them - because the biomechanics are so
simple - and (as I told them in 1993) - the biomechanics were already in the
medical literature! See the 1913 Emmons quote above.

THE KICKER: The orginal author of Williams Obstetrics (J. Whitridge
Williams, MD at Johns Hopkins) was the first to demonstrate sacroiliac
motion - massive change in pelvic outlet diameter - in a 1911 clinical
study...

Yet somehow, by the 1970s the authors of Williams Obstetrics were saying
that the pelvic diameters DON'T CHANGE.

And when Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that the pelvic diameters DO change -
the authors of Williams Obstetrics suddenly decided their favorite delivery
position - dorsal lithotomy - widens.

It was a lie then - and it was a lie in 2001 when they wrote:

"The most widely used and often the most satisfactory...[delivery position]
is...dorsal lithotomy...in order to increase the diameter of the pelvic
outlet." [Williams Obstetrics 2001:316]

It's STILL a lie. (But maybe they've finally changed it: The newest edition
of Williams Obstetrics is due out in March 2005, according to one Barnes and
Noble employee.)

SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT MAL - exposing THE major lie/subluxation of
obstetrics - and teaching women that they can easily allow their pelvic
outlets to OPEN the "extra" up to 30% - just by rolling onto their sides as
they push their babies out.

WARNING #1: Some obstetricians and midwives will let women "try"
alternative delivery positions (some are listed above) but will move them
back to semisitting or dorsal (close the birth canal up to 30%) for the
actual delivery.

WARNING #2: MOST obstetricians will KEEP birth canals closed the "extra" up
to 30% when babies get stuck.

Obstetricians are lying to cover-up their truly bizarre - sometimes fatal -
pregnancy fetish.

So I adjust/educate.

I hope everyone joins me in this simple, non-spinal chiropractic
adjusting/teaching.

Sincerely,

Todd


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vaginas: Penis size vs. Baby size (Dr. Horkel's EPI-NO) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 11 June 15th 04 08:49 PM
Medical illustrators: Global effort for babies Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 April 23rd 04 11:34 PM
APHA: Birth, a neuromusculoskeletal complaint Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 March 19th 04 02:12 AM
NPR: How to make labor more painful (SURPRISE!) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 March 3rd 04 10:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.