If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
Hi the
My wife had an elevated blood AFP (5MoM) followed by amnio at 18 weeks which also showed a high AF AFP (16MoM). 3 ultrasounds have definitively ruled out neural tube defects; chromosomal analysis is negative for Downs or similar syndromes. I am an MD myself (different specialty) and we dont have a definite idea what is wrong here. A possibility is something called congenital nephrosis of Finnish type, but it is a very rare condition, and we are not the right ethnicity. I am wondering if anyone here has had an experience like this or know of someone who has, and what the pregnancy outcome was. If the AFP levels were lower in the amnio, we could have thought that this was some kind of false positive result, but this level seems too high, so that inspite of normal US, echo, chromosomal results, we are quite worried. Any and all opinions are welcome. Thanks for your time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
Someone wrote:
My wife had an elevated blood AFP (5MoM) followed by amnio at 18 weeks which also showed a high AF AFP (16MoM). 3 ultrasounds have definitively ruled out neural tube defects; chromosomal analysis is negative for Downs or similar syndromes. Okay, I will try to help. My little girl, now a thriving toddler, was born with a fetal tumor for which AFP is an important marker, so I know a little about it. First, you are entering into the realm of "whatever it is, it is really rare" so I recommend you make a point of obtaining copies of all laboratory test results and radiology reports. That is because the likelihood of mistakes is large relative to the likelihood of any one rare problem that gives an elevated AFP. Being an MD yourself, you probably already know to do this. Maternal serum AFP varies with several maternal factors, including race and age. And it varies *hugely* with fetal age. So are you 100% sure about the baby's gestational age? Double check that both AFP results give the correct gestational age for the date when the sample was drawn. Double check that the risk factors are correctly stated on the AFP order form and/or the report. Re chromosomal analysis, have you had only the basic check for the correct number of chromosomes? Or have you had the more detailed check that all chromosomes are intact? How many bands were looked at (it should be hundreds). Do you know the baby's sex from ultrasounds? Does it match the chromosome test result? Does the chromosome test result mention an excess of maternal blood in the sample? One source of error in chromosome tests is mistaken analysis of chromosomes from the mother, not the baby. If the baby is a boy on ultrasounds and the chromosome analysis says the same, you have little to worry about on this count, but if the baby is a girl you don't know for sure they looked at her chromosomes and not your wife's. If you don't mind sharing, what were the actual values of AFP in maternal serum and amniotic fluid, by gestational age? I would rather not scare you (and perhaps other readers here) by discussing the many medical conditions that can cause very high MS and AF AFP, until I am convinced the AFP values you are seeing are in fact very high. Does that seem fair? Pologirl 2004 Monkey Boy 2006 Hungry Girl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
Thanks Pologirl for the long reply.
Here are the details: MS-AFP at 15.9 weeks= 5.2 MoM (other markers PLAPP, HCG, Inhibin, etc normal) Amnio at 18 weeks: AF-AFP= 16.29 MoM AchE= negative FISH chromosmal test (the quick test)= normal Regular chromosomal analysis= normal, XY (male, as in US) Also, Nuchal normal at 11.5 wks, Level 2 USs at 17.5 weeks and 21 weeks normal (no NTDs, no abdominal wall problems and no obvious placental problems), Fetal echo normal at 21 weeks We are quite sure abt the gestational age, confirmed by US at 7 weeks. Thanks again. On Oct 28, 11:24 pm, Pologirl wrote: Someone wrote: My wife had an elevated blood AFP (5MoM) followed by amnio at 18 weeks which also showed a high AF AFP (16MoM). 3 ultrasounds have definitively ruled out neural tube defects; chromosomal analysis is negative for Downs or similar syndromes. Okay, I will try to help. My little girl, now a thriving toddler, was born with a fetal tumor for which AFP is an important marker, so I know a little about it. First, you are entering into the realm of "whatever it is, it is really rare" so I recommend you make a point of obtaining copies of all laboratory test results and radiology reports. That is because the likelihood of mistakes is large relative to the likelihood of any one rare problem that gives an elevated AFP. Being an MD yourself, you probably already know to do this. Maternal serum AFP varies with several maternal factors, including race and age. And it varies *hugely* with fetal age. So are you 100% sure about the baby's gestational age? Double check that both AFP results give the correct gestational age for the date when the sample was drawn. Double check that the risk factors are correctly stated on the AFP order form and/or the report. Re chromosomal analysis, have you had only the basic check for the correct number of chromosomes? Or have you had the more detailed check that all chromosomes are intact? How many bands were looked at (it should be hundreds). Do you know the baby's sex from ultrasounds? Does it match the chromosome test result? Does the chromosome test result mention an excess of maternal blood in the sample? One source of error in chromosome tests is mistaken analysis of chromosomes from the mother, not the baby. If the baby is a boy on ultrasounds and the chromosome analysis says the same, you have little to worry about on this count, but if the baby is a girl you don't know for sure they looked at her chromosomes and not your wife's. If you don't mind sharing, what were the actual values of AFP in maternal serum and amniotic fluid, by gestational age? I would rather not scare you (and perhaps other readers here) by discussing the many medical conditions that can cause very high MS and AF AFP, until I am convinced the AFP values you are seeing are in fact very high. Does that seem fair? Pologirl 2004 Monkey Boy 2006 Hungry Girl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
Thanks Pologirl for the long reply.
Here are the details: MS-AFP at 15.9 weeks= 5.2 MoM (other markers PLAPP, HCG, Inhibin, etc normal) Amnio at 18 weeks: AF-AFP= 16.29 MoM AchE= negative FISH chromosmal test (the quick test)= normal Regular chromosomal analysis= normal, XY (male, as in US) Also, Nuchal normal at 11.5 wks, Level 2 USs at 17.5 weeks and 21 weeks normal (no NTDs, no abdominal wall problems and no obvious placental problems), Fetal echo normal at 21 weeks We are quite sure abt the gestational age, confirmed by US at 7 weeks. Thanks again. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
My daughter was born with a sacrococcygeal teratoma but it was
unnoticeable, it was not noticeable in the morphology scan either. It wasn't noticed untill the tumor started to grow at approx 5 weeks of age (to where it was the size of a pea) at the age of her operation (9 weeks) it had grown to the size of an olive. The reason why her tumor was not picked up was becuase it had a faulty blood supply - hense it hadn't really grown at all. (well not untill after birth) I have no idea how it works exactly but I often wonder if they would have done an AFP level on either myself or an amnio if they were able to pick it up. Amanda-Jane On Oct 30, 9:15 am, wrote: Thanks Pologirl for the long reply. Here are the details: MS-AFP at 15.9 weeks= 5.2 MoM (other markers PLAPP, HCG, Inhibin, etc normal) Amnio at 18 weeks: AF-AFP= 16.29 MoM AchE= negative FISH chromosmal test (the quick test)= normal Regular chromosomal analysis= normal, XY (male, as in US) Also, Nuchal normal at 11.5 wks, Level 2 USs at 17.5 weeks and 21 weeks normal (no NTDs, no abdominal wall problems and no obvious placental problems), Fetal echo normal at 21 weeks We are quite sure abt the gestational age, confirmed by US at 7 weeks. Thanks again. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
very elevated amniotic fluid AFP- normal U/S, echo, etc.
In misc.kids.pregnancy, Amanda-Jane wrote:
My daughter was born with a sacrococcygeal teratoma but it was unnoticeable, it was not noticeable in the morphology scan either. It wasn't noticed untill the tumor started to grow at approx 5 weeks of age (to where it was the size of a pea) at the age of her operation (9 weeks) it had grown to the size of an olive. [...] I have no idea how it works exactly but I often wonder if they would have done an AFP level on either myself or an amnio if they were able to pick it up. Hi Amanda-Jane. Do you have the pathology report on the tumor, from after surgery? If the pathology was pure teratoma, the odds are close to 100% that your baby's tumor produced no AFP, so any prenatal AFP tests would have been normal. Are you having her AFP checked regularly? That is very important, even for a "benign" teratoma. Una |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low amniotic fluid | Me Myself and I | Pregnancy | 18 | September 11th 05 08:40 PM |
Low Amniotic Fluid | Jennifer Howe | Pregnancy | 6 | April 23rd 05 09:46 PM |
Low Amniotic Fluid | Jennifer Howe | Pregnancy | 4 | April 20th 05 04:04 PM |
Low amniotic fluid? | Donna Metler | Pregnancy | 3 | July 10th 04 04:08 AM |