ATTENTION CALIF EPA (DTSC): DENTISTS PROMOTE ILLEGAL HAZARDOUS WASTE
ACTIVITY (fluoridation)
DTSC = Department of Toxic Substances Control of Calif EPA...
FLUORIDATION MAY NOT EVEN PREVENT CAVITIES! See CDC FRAUD? below.
Cal EPA/DTSC Director Edwin F. Lowry: I'd like Calif EPA/DTSC to
immediately end in California the hazardous waste activity euphemistically
known as "fluoridation"...
"DTSC's scientists...regularly provide cutting-edge information
about...toxic substances, helping to avoid exposure that may be dangerous to
children and adults."
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/ToxicQuestion..._Overview.html
CUTTING EDGE: THE TOXIC SUBSTANCE FLUORIDE CAN BE DANGEROUS AT
"FLUORIDATION" LEVELS...
Our own National Academy of Sciences says drinking water at HALF the federal
EPA's permissible level can cause "crippling skeletal fluorosis" in 10
years' time. See The Fluoride Deception by Christopher Bryson [NY: Seven
Stories 2004:221]
Check out how our federal EPA arrived at 4ppm fluoride as the maximum
permissible level. It's incredible! See below.
"[DTSC]...protects...Californians from exposures to hazardous wastes..."
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/
FLUORIDATION = EXPOSURE TO THE HAZARDOUS WASTE CALLED HYDROFLUOROSILICIC
ACID...
DTSC employees (and other Californians)...
"If you know about illegal hazardous waste activities, call the [DTSC]
Complaints Hotline at (800) 698-6942 or (800) 69TOXIC..."
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/
DENTISTS **PROMOTE** AN ILLEGAL HAZARDOUS WASTE ACTIVITY...
IT'S MASS CHILD ABUSE (**OBVIOUS** MASS CHILD ABUSE) - SEE THOR below.
I'm copying Disneyland DA Tony Rackauckas again via
I'm also copying Oregon Attorney General Hardy Meyers again via
AGAIN, FLUORIDE MAY NOT EVEN PREVENT CAVITIES!
See CDC FRAUD? below....
FIRST THIS...
Steve Bornfeld, DDS recently asked publicly,
"How do you feel about iodized salt?"
I reply...
Steve,
I feel pretty good about iodized salt - as long as it isn't overdone or made
mandatory.
Iodine is a necessary nutrient. There are iodine deficiency diseases.
Fluoride is NOT a necessary nutrient. There are no fluoride deficiency
diseases.
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
PS Steve here is something I feel BAD about:
The American Dental Association suggests that fluoride is FOOD, saying,
"As with other nutrients, fluoride is safe..."
http://www.ada.org/public/topics/flu...acts/index.asp
Fluoride is a known TOXIN derived from HAZARDOUS WASTE. Most other
nutrients aren't toxins.
Even assuming that fluoride is food/nutrition - and good food/nutrition at
that...
Fluoridation is obviously illegal when it is used as "medical food"/"medical
treatment" because some people are fluoridated WITHOUT CONSENT...
The California Supreme Court wrote in its THOR decision [1993]:
"The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who
performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a
battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Daniel Thor v. The
Superior Court of Solano County 93 C.D.O.S. 5658 at 5659]
In THOR, the medical treatment was FOOD...
Prisoner Andrews wanted to die via starvation - and the California Supreme
Court DENIED prison physician Daniel THOR his request to force Prisoner
Andrews to eat FOOD via the medical procedure, insertion of a gastrostomy
tube.
http://www.dickinson.edu/endoflife/LawCA.html
I mention THOR because muncipalities are aping the American Dental
Association, indicating that fluoride is FOOD - a "safe" "nutrient"...
I mention THOR because the fluoridation "gastrostomy tube" (municipal
plumbing) is already in place when it is decided to "feed" people the toxic
"fluoride" "nutrient" WITHOUT CONSENT...
Again quoting THOR: "A physician who performs any medical procedure without
the patient's consent commits a
battery irrespective of the skill or care used."
Fluoridation is obviously mass battery - even if the toxic fluoride "nutrien
t" is good medicine (which is doubtful; see the EPA and CDC shenanigans
mentioned below....
Mass battery against children is mass child abuse.
The American Dental Association is promoting mass child abuse - OBVIOUS mass
child abuse when one considers THOR...
IMPORTANT NOTE...
The Pinellas County (Florida) Commissioners' Utility Department is one of
those utilities that blithely parrots the American Dental Association's
fraudulent inference that fluoride is food...
See Pinellas mass medicator Latvala (Suspected Child Abuse Report)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2678
It is likely that other utilities departments across America are blithely
parroting ADA's fraudulent inference that fluoride is food....
THE DENTAL TWINS...
Steve, you and your brother Mark ("the dental twins") state in your "Dental
FAQ":
"[P]ublic water systems, if fluoridated, will have the fluoride
concentrations adjusted to an appropriate level..."
http://www.dentaltwins.com/ (Click on "Dental FAQ" then on "Toxic
Conspiracies FAQ")
You infer in your FAQ that 1ppm fluoride in drinking water is safe.
How do you know that 1ppm fluoride is safe?
How do you know that 1ppm fluoride from *hydrofluorosilicic acid* is safe?
Reportedly, there have been NO safety studies on "hydrofluorosilicic acid" -
and check out CDC FRAUD? and the EPA toxic shenanigans below...
I think you and Mark should change your "Dental FAQ/Toxic Conspiracies FAQ"
to
reflect the fact that we simply don't know that 1ppm fluoride is safe -
or "appropriate."
CAN DENTISTS EVEN RENDER PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ON FLUORIDE LEVEL
SAFETY/APPROPRIATENESS?
In California, the determination of whether a specific individual, or subset
of the population, is at any time suffering from, or will suffer from,
adverse health effects outside of the oral cavity from ingested fluoride is
not apparently within the purview of dentistry. See California Board of
Dental Examiners letter, reproduced below.
Steve, in New York, is the determination of whether a specific individual,
or subset of the population, is at any time suffering from, or will suffer
from, adverse health effects outside of the oral cavity from ingested
fluoridewithin the purview of dentistry.
If so, please advise. If not, you should label your statement as PERSONAL
OPINION.
Again, you don't even mention hydrofluorosilicic acid in your FAQ.
There are no safety data yet for this substance - which is used in most
municipal water supplies - and there is growing evidence that
hydrofluorosilicic acid is toxic even as low "fluoridation" levels - and not
just due to the fluoride toxin.
EPA once fired a scientist for mentioning on television that EPA is ignoring
CANCER risk from fluoridation.
See The Fluoride Deception by Christopher Bryson [NY: Seven Stories 2004]
THIS IS WEIRD: The previous EPA maximum permissible level of fluoride was
2.3ppm - but then EPA abruptly set the maximum permissible level of fluoride
at 4ppm.
What happened?
EPA didn't do any safety testing. EPA went to 4ppm when South Carolina sued
EPA when EPA tried to get South Carolina to reduce its fluoride level to
2.3ppm - the previous EPA maximum permissible level!
There was NO safety testing! Again, see The Fluoride Deception [2004]
Our own National Academy of Sciences has indicated that drinking fluoridated
water at HALF of EPA's permissible level can cause "crippling skeletal
fluorosis" in 10 years.
What can one FOURTH of EPA's pemissible level (Ipmm) do in 40 years? (Most
cities fluoridate at about 1ppm.)
What does crippling skeletal fluorosis feel like BEFORE it becomes
crippling?
Inspite of the NAS warning about crippling skeletal fluorosis, EPA thinks
the earliest sign of fluoride overdose - mottling/staining of teeth (dental
fluorosis) - is just a cosmetic effect - not an adverse health effect.
When an EPA scientist complained that EPA was trying to get him to say that
"funky" teeth are just cosmetic - no adverse health effect...
1500 EPA scientists signed a document in opposition!
Up to 63% of children suffer "dental fluorosis" the earliest sign of
fluoride overdose in areas where there is "optimal fluoridation." (!)
And EPA says it's just cosmetic!
EPA once tried to cover-up CANCER risk of fluoridation:
Dr. J. William Hirzy, one of the EPA scientists opposed to fluoridation
writes; "EPA fired the Office of Drinking Water's chief toxicologist, Dr.
William Marcus...for refusing to remain silent on the cancer risk issue (9).
The judge who heard the lawsuit...[found]...that EPA fired him over his
fluoride work and not for the phony reason put forward by EPA management at
his dismissal. Dr. Marcus won his lawsuit and is again at work at EPA..."
http://www.fluoridealert.org/hp-epa.htm
And then there are the NEUROTOXICITY studies of Dr. Phyllis Mullenix. Some
cases of ADHD, Alzheimers MAY be symptoms of fluoride overdose. See The
Fluoride Deception by Christopher Bryson [NY: Seven Stories 2004:221]
CDC FRAUD?
THE TOXIC "NUTRIENT" FLUORIDE MAY NOT EVEN PREVENT CAVITIES!!
Environmental chemist Prof. Paul
Connett writes:
"[T]he CDC...claimed the drop in tooth decay (from the 1960s to the 1990s)
was related to the percentage of the population drinking fluoridated
water...World Health Organization figures that showed these same or greater
declines were occurring in most nonfluoridated countries, thus suggesting
that the CDC authors were either incompetent or fraudulent."
http://stpetetimes.com/2004/07/09/Ta...icize_fl.shtml
Prof. Connett is holding the 1st Citizen's Conference on Fluoride Friday,
July 30 - Monday, August 2, 2004 in Canton, NY...
For conference details...
See The Disneyland DA and The Fluoride Deception...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2629
UCLA grads might ask themselves why the UCLA chemistry department never
responded to either me or Prof. Connett after I sent $1000.00.
**DID** UCLA COERCE DENTAL STUDENT SILENCE?
I wonder if anyone in the UCLA chemistry department ever checked out this
doozy of a statement:
"[i]t was made clear to [UCLA dental] students that anyone who deviated from
the
orthodox line and questioned the
benefits of fluoridation wouldn't be allowed to graduate..."
--UCLA dental school grad Mae Woo paraphrased...
http://www.vaccinationnews.com/Daily...deDebate27.htm
Here now is that remarkable letter where the California Board of Dental
Examiners indicates that dentists may not render professional opinions about
what fluoride does outside the mouth...
Board of Dental Examiners
1432 Howe Ave, Ste 85
Sacramento, CA 95925-3241
(916) 263-2300
December 21, 1999
David C. Kennedy, D.D.S.
Past President
International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology
2425 Third Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101
Dear Dr. Kennedy:
Recently, you wrote to the Board of Dental Examiners and asked for a yes or
no answer to the following question:
"Is the determination of whether a specific individual, or subset of the
population, is at any time suffering from, or will suffer from, adverse
health effects outside of the oral cavity from ingested fluoride within the
purview of dentistry?"
As we understand the question, the answer is no. As phrased, your question
would appear to relate to a medical diagnosis.
I hope this adequately addresses your question.
Sincerely,
Arlyce Ten Broeck
Assistant Executive Officer
cc: Georgetta Coleman, E.O.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water (San Diego) offers this Background and
Commentary
The significance of this answer should be apparent to those individuals who
have seen local dentists, as well as national spokespersons with dental
licenses, offer their credentials as a dentist as proof that they possess
expertise on the subject of whether adverse health effects do or do not
occur, or may or may not occur, as a result of exposure to ingested
fluoride.
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water and other groups throughout the nation have
informed deliberative bodies such as city councils and water boards, as well
as the media, of the fact that the dental community has had no professional
training on the subject of ingested fluoride (rather than topically-applied
fluoride, such as toothpaste), much less continuing education to keep the
industry or its members abreast of new scientific studies and risk
assessments.
This statement confirms that position and once again reinforces that the
subject matter of fluoridation is rightfully one of the appropriate use of
the public water supply, and the impact of mass medication on the entire
body, rather than children's teeth and blanket denials of any possible
adverse effects from uninformed special interests.
This letter from the Board of Dental Examiners follows on the heels of their
December 3, 1999 hearing at which Citizens for Safe Drinking Water informed
the Board that they should expect to see more consumer complaints from
citizens against dentists who willingly use their professional standing to
lend credibility to selling industrial hazardous waste fluoride while
claiming that they are experts on the subject, when in fact they have no
accreditated training or professional license to diagnose outside of the
oral cavity.
The Board of Dental Examiners had previously disapproved continuing
education credits for a symposium on the risk assessment of ingested
fluoride on the grounds that the subject matter did not apply to the
practice of dentistry.
Citizens for Safe Drinking Water has suggested that concerned citizens in
other states write directly to their state's Board of Dental Examiners to
request written confirmation to determine if their state also has
limitations on the scope of a dentist's expertise.
In California, to register comments/complaints about the Board of Dental
Examiners,
CITIZENS COMPLAINT FORM
Contact: Jeff Green - Citizens for Safe Drinking Water
2425 Third Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101
(800) 728-3833
Email:
Email:
http://www.nofluoride.com/cal_dental_examiners.htm
"Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS" wrote in message
...
Todd Gastaldo wrote:
Peter Meiers
History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation
http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm
Peter,
I had no idea that finding NON-fluoridated table salt could be
difficult in
Europe.
How do you feel about iodized salt?
Steve
Most people use salt - so you are right (if I am understanding you
correctly) - making non-fluoridated table salt difficult to find
approaches
mandatory fluoridation.
I still think it significant though that most European countries have
rendered WATER fluoridation illegal.
Thanks for reading.
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
PS According to the French fluoridated table salt scheme, supported by
"more
than 15,000 dentists throughout over France":
"There is also salt without fluor into consumers to choose. French
regulations do not allow imposition of a single kind of salt to be sold;
it
is compulsory to let the consumer choose by himself....labeling to
include
two specifics sentences. The first is: 'Do not absorb if drinking water
contains more than 0,5 milligrams of fluoride per liter'..."
http://www.ibiblio.org/taft/cedros/e...r/n6/Salt.html
The stuff is getting everywhere! This is toxic waste dumping at its
most
creative.
"Peter Meiers" wrote in message
...
Todd Gastaldo wrote:
The German salt fluoridation program is OPTIONAL - at least this is
what
I
gathered from your website:
"[W]e parents were asked to sign, saying that our child would be given
fluoride tablets in the kindergarten. Needless to say my wife and I
didnīt
sign..."
http://pmeiers.bei.t-online.de/mystory.htm
Todd, this clearly refers to fluoride tablet programs in the
kindergarten.
We now have fluoridated table salt. Although this was originally
introduced to be optional, it is now on the selves of every warehouse
while the non-fluoridated variety becomes increasingly rare. What
options do you have without alternative?
One more thing: we are basically on the same side of the fence. However,
my concern is not limited to just WATER fluoridation.
The Europe argument is not useless at all.
It is. It is as much nonsense as Brysonīs "Donīt blame the dentists"
thing.
Peter
--
-History of fluorine, fluoride and fluoridation-:
--- http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/index.htm ---
----------------------------------------------------
- Fluor. Auf den Spuren eines Wundermittels - :
--http://PMeiers.bei.t-online.de/deutsch/index.htm--
----------------------------------------------------
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
http://www.dentaltwins.com
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
My thanks to Steve Bornfeld, DDS for asking about how I feel about iodized
salt.
I personally prefer sea salt - but iodized salt can prevent disease. I
think all of Canada's salt is iodized?
Thanks for reading everyone.
REMEMBER...
"If you know about illegal hazardous waste activities, call the [DTSC]
Complaints Hotline at (800) 698-6942 or (800) 69TOXIC..."
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/
Again, DTSC, I'd like to see an end to fluoridation in California -
immediately...
Preferably before Prof. Connett's 1st Citizen's Conference on Fluoride
starts on July 30.
For conference details...
See
http://www.fluoridealert.org/confere...gistration.pdf
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
This post will be archived for global access within 24 hours in the Google
usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Calif EPA: Dentists
promote illegal hazardous waste activity (fluoridation)"