Various MD crimes (obvious ones)

"In its current form, habits and environment, American healthcare is
incapable of providing the public with the quality healthcare it deserves"
--Institute of Medicine's Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America
quoted by Oregon's PEBB (PEBB employees listed below)
http://egov.oregon.gov/DAS/PEBB/visionfaq.shtml

In its current form, habits and environment, American healthcare involves
various MD crimes - massive crimes...

Mass child abuse: MDs are knowingly closing birth canals up to 30% and
*keeping* birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck. Sound
crazy? PROOF below.

PREGNANT WOMEN: For simple instructions on how to allow your birth canal to
OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, see the very end of this post.

(LADIES: You can help protect your VAGINAS too. See episiotomy discussion
below.)


Since it's obvious child abuse, will MDs report MDs?

North Carolina attorney/doctor ROBERT A. BITTERMAN, MD, JD might...

Robert's employer THE CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM says:

"ANY person or institution who has cause to suspect that a child is being
abused or neglected is required by law to report."
http://www.carolinas.org/services/wo...childabuse.cfm
(emphasis added)

Robert, please report. See my note to you at the end of this post.


Maybe NORTH CAROLINA'S doctors of chiropractic will report?

After all, the child abuse is SPINAL MANIPULATION CHILD ABUSE BY OBs...

With birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%, OBs are violently pushing on
tiny spines (with oxytocin, Cytotec, PGE2) and gruesomely pulling (with
hands, forceps vacuums)...

Sometimes OBs pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.

Some babies die. Some babies are paralyzed. Most babies "only" have their
spines gruesomely wrenched.

ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal senselessly closed
up to 30%.


North Carolina's Marc Gottlieb, DC suggested PREVENTION of birth trauma in
1993.

See Gottlieb MS. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Oct;16(8):537-43, quoted
below.

CHIROS: WFC's Attorney David Chapman-Smith (encouraged by DCs) could
possibly get the **World Health Organization** interested in preventing
vertebral subluxations!

More on this below.


OTHER MD CRIMES (mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse for example)

I wrote that MDs are fraudulently promoting vaccinations by claiming IN
EFFECT that vaccination works 100% of the time...

HILLARY ISRAELI, VMD "responded":

"No MD worth his or her salt would ever make such a claim. I have seen
PLENTY of MDs for vaccinations and not a one has ever made such a claim. In
fact, far from it.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...&output=gplain

Hillary,

MANY things MDs do make them "worth their salt," but fraudulent vaccination
promotion is not one of those things...

Here again is the text you snipped...

[I wrote it to Jeff P.Utz, MD, pediatrician...]

....MDs are claiming IN EFFECT that vaccination works 100% of the time....

Vaccine-exempt children are sent home (protected) during disease outbreaks -
but vaccinated-but-not-immunized children are NOT so protected...

MDs are *endangering vaccinated children* as they IN EFFECT claim that
vaccination works 100% of the time!

If vaccine exempt children are worth protecting during disease outbreaks, so
are *vaccinated* children not immunized by their vaccinations.

[ALL children must be sent home (protected) during disease outbreaks - not
just vaccine exempt children. The laws must be changed.]

Vaccination does NOT always work - vaccination is NOT immunization -
vaccination is ATTEMPTED immunization.

Text above is from Pediatrics is science! LOL! (Jeff the pediatrician
again...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2525


REGARDING IMMUNIZATION...

MDs ARE SUBSTANTIALLY **ANTI**-IMMUNIZATION...

MDs are failing to tell the world that breastfeeding women scan for
pathogens and manufacture specific IMMUNIZATIONS which they inject with
their breasts daily.

MDs are thereby lying by omission effectively DENYING massive numbers of
babies massive numbers of free daily immunizations.

EXAMPLE: The Carolinas HealthCare System indicates that breastmilk is mere
FOOD, as in,
"The popularity of breastfeeding has been gaining through the last few
decades, and it's no wonder, considering all of the benefits of this natural
food source."
http://www.carolinas.org/services/womenchild/

Breastmilk is a free daily IMMUNIZATION source that reportedly makes MD
needle vaccinations work better!

How hard would it be for Carolinas HealthCare System to say that?!

How hard would it be for ALL HealthCare Systems to say that?!

Doing so would make breastfeeding popularity SKYROCKET

What woman - explicitly informed that she can IMMUNIZE her baby daily - is
going to fail to at least ATTEMPT to do so - esp. since breastfeeding
reportedly makes vaccinations work better?

MDs are missing a GOLDEN opportunity to make the immunization rate AND the
vaccination rate skyrocket!

WHY?!

Via their lie of omission, MDs are committing mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse -
mass immunologic neglect - CULTURE-WIDE.

Mass PHYSICAL child abuse


This mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse by MDs



MORE physical child abuse by MDs (in addition to closing birth canals up to
30%, discussed further below)...

American MD-pediatricians (and MD-obstetricians) engage in mass ripping and
slicing of infant penises - sometimes fatally so.

The medical euphemism is "routine infant circumcision."

According to some nurses and MDs...

INFANT CIRCUMCISION IS A BRUTAL, BARBARIC PRACTICE...

"After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and
listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any longer." [Sperlich
BK, Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16. http://www.cirp.org/nrc/]

"Nursing alert...[N]urses must consider their participation in a
surgical procedure that involves no anesthesia to be a barbaric
practice." (p. 205) Donna L. Wong's Essentials of
Pediatric Nursing [1997]

"[S]till all too often barbaric...[M.D.s]...would never allow older children
or
adults to be subjected to such practices, nor would they submit to it
themselves..." [Veteran circumcision cheerleader Colonel Thomas E. Wiswell,
MD in article in the April 24, 1997 New England Journal of
Medicine]

THINK ABOUT IT

AS INFANTS SCREAM AND WRITHE AND BLEED...

"One-half to one-third of the skin on the...penile shaft is sliced
off." http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (paraphrasing Ronald Goldman,
PhD,
author of Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

"The average circumcision cuts off what would grow into
about 12 square inches of sexually sensitive skin."
http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm (quoting Ronald Goldman, PhD, author of
Circumcision: The Hidden Trauma)

In 1987, American MD-pediatricians perpetuated the mass ripping and slicing
of infant penises by perpetuating medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology.

(Incredibly, the journal Pediatrics STILL hasn't acknowledged that AAP
perpetuated phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology in late 1987; indeed, I
think it was 1999 before pediatricians finally decided for sure that babies
can feel pain...)

In late 1987, saw American medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology perpetuated uncorrected in AAP's journal Pediatrics.

Since there were/are NO medical indications for American medicine's most
frequent surgical behavior toward males...

1. I called for an END to the obvious mass child abuse.

2. I also called for a religious exemption from the child abuse statutes for
Jewish circumcision...

A religious exemption for Jews would have finally officially/legally
ACKNOWLEDGED that routine infant circumcision is child abuse...

Pediatricians understandably (though unconscionably) resorted to
anti-Semitism...

In Jan 1988 American pediatricians came out against ALL religious
exemptions - i.e. - American pediatricians tried to hide behind religion.
The pediatricians were saying in effect: if we MDs are made to stop, Jews
must be made to stop...it was anti-Semitism.

In Feb 1988 the pediatricians came out in favor of anonymity for
PERPETRATORS of child abuse.

In March 1988 the California Medical Association ignored its own Scientific
Board and by voice vote instantly created "an effective public health
measure" out of "no medical indication" routine infant circumcision.

NOTE: In AAP's subsequent official statements on circumcision, AAP
mentioned neither CMA's new "effective public health measure" nor the fact
that it was declared in March 1988, just months after AAP's perpetuation of
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology had been exposed.

This KEY fact *must* be mentioned whenever MDs publish their "potential
medical benefits" game.

For further details...

See Cosmetic body piercing/infant circumcision
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2465


See also: Chiro care of baby penises (also: Dr. Poland never sued Dr.
Gastaldo)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2430


American MDs STILL make most male infants scream and writhe and bleed and
sometimes die or lose their penises...

American MDs still continue to fraudulently PROMOTE their grisly most
frequent surgical behavior toward males...

Alanis and Lucidi [2004] of the Carolinas Medical Center recently told a
bald lie:

"[i]mportant research has shed light on real medical benefits of
circumcision."

REAL medical benefits?

WRONG.

Alanis and Lucidi [2004]

"TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists...After completion of this
article, the reader should be able to describe the evolution of
circumcision...[and]...list the POTENTIAL benefits of circumcision..."
---Alanis MC, Lucidi RS^^^. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 May;59(5):379-95.
PubMed abstract (emphasis added)

^^^Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center,
Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

"POTENTIAL" medical benefits are NOT "real medical benefits."

"Potential" medical benefits was the grisly game begun by the American
Academy of Pediatrics after exposure of the phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology.

See again: Chiro care of baby penises (also: Dr. Poland never sued Dr.
Gastaldo)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2430

Alanis and Lucidi [2004] wrote in their abstract:

"Because of advances in the understanding of the anatomy of the foreskin and
pain conditioning in infants, prevailing attitudes have changed about
anesthesia and analgesia during the procedure."

Wrong again.

Advances in the understanding of "pain conditioning in infants" have NOT
changed "prevailing attitudes about anesthesia and analgesia during the
procedure."

The prevailing medical attitude is STILL: If a parent consents - infants
can be made to scream and writhe and bleed through procedure for which there
are no medical indications - and there is no need to give anesthesia or
analgesia!

This prevailing medical attitude goes against state child abuse laws and
stated AAP ethics:

"[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist
independent of parental desires...

"...A[n infant's screaming writhing and bleeding obviously constitutes
the - TDG] patient's reluctance or refusal to assent [and - TDG]
should...carry considerable weight when the proposed intervention is not
essential to his or her welfare
and/or can be deferred without substantial risk...

"[T]hose who care for children need to provide for measures to solicit
assent and to attend to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when
ethical conflicts occur."
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric
Practice(RE9510)
Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
http://www.aap.org/policy/00662.html

In 1980, one pediatrician wrote:

"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]

In 1986, another wrote:

"What a terrible indictment...guilty of failing those for whom we have
chosen to be advocates." [Finkel KC: The failure to report child abuse.
AJDC, 1986;140:329-330]

JEWISH RITUAL CIRCUMCISION

As noted above, I am in favor of a Jewish exemption from the child abuse
statutes.

I am convinced that observant Jews sincerely believe that a God wants them
to cut off their sons' foreskins...

"[T]he LORD met Moses and was about to kill him. But Zipporah took a flint
knife, cut off her son's foreskin and touched Moses' feet with it...So the
LORD let him alone...(Genesis 4:24-26)"
http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net...y/zipporah.asp

KEY POINTS: The Jewish ritual is FAST and the original Jewish ritual left
most of the
foreskin on the
penis.

The late Edward Wallerstein won an American Medical Writers Award for
gathering much of the historical evidence in "Circumcision: An American
Health Fallacy" [NY: Springer 1980]

Later, Wallerstein wrote of the minimal ancient practice in a 1983 article:

"Originally, the surgery involved only cutting the tip of the foreskin.
This was changed in the Hellenic Period to prevent [Jews from]
elongat[ing] the foreskin stump in order to appear uncircumcised."
[Wallerstein E. Humanistic Judaism 1983;11(4):46]

Fortunately, some modern rabbis (hotly contested by other rabbis)
offer American Jews an ideological basis
not to circumcise...

According to Rabbi MN Kertner:

"[Circumcision] is not a sacrament which inducts the infant into
Judaism: his birth does that" [Rabbi MN Kertner. What is a Jew? New
York: Macmillan, 1973,1993] NOTE: Adult Jews who wish to remain
uncircumcised
are accepted under Israel's Law of Return, which indicates that even
"religious" circumcision is a CHOICE which may legitimately be postponed
until adulthood and beyond...

And according to Rabbi Michael Lerner:

"The infliction of unnecessary pain is precisely what Judaism is
designed to fight against, so it makes little sense for us to be the
perpetrators on our children." [Rabbi Michael Lerner. Jewish Renewal NY:
G.P. Putnam's Sons 1994:387])

NOTE ALSO: RABBIS CAN CHANGE THE BIBLICAL RULES

Hershel Shanks, editor of Moment, has noted that "the rabbis of the
Talmud OFTEN changed the Biblical rules" (emphasis added):

"A friend...[argued]...with regard to the Orthodox rabbis' pronouncement
declaring Reform and Conservative not Judaism...[that]...[i]t's all
traceable to the [U.S.] Reform decision nearly 15 years ago to adopt
patrilineality - a child born of a Jewish father, if raised as a Jew, is
Jewish....

"....[i]n Biblical times, Jewish descent was determined by the
Jewishness of the father...The rabbis changed that 2,000 year-old
tradition...Indeed the rabbis of the Talmud OFTEN changed the Biblical
rules (emphasis added)..."
[Shanks H. Tolerance v. Halachah. Moment. (Jun)1997;22(3):6, 8-9]

Modern rabbis could switch back to "tip" circumcisions
- or even to NO circumcisions - if they really wanted to.

Again, I still favor a religious exemption for Jews. Jews do NOT
circumcise for medical reasons - they circumcise because their God wants
them
to - at least this is what they sincerely believe - and I believe them.


In discussing "the evolution of circumcision," I hope Alanis and Lucidi
mentioned the minimal ancient practice AND the anti-Semitic, child
abuse-perpetuating anti-science that occurred (see above) when I exposed
pediatricians perpetuating phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology back in
1987...

I will cc Alanis and Lucidi....

Copied to Mark Alanis, MD
http://www.carolinas.org/education/m.../Residents.cfm

Copied to Richard Scott Lucidi, M.D.
http://www.uthscsa.edu/obgyn/res-faculty.html


BTW, American medicine's $200 million dollar per year most frequent surgical
behavior toward males SHOULD have ended billions of dollars worth of infant
screams ago - back in 1987 when I pointed out AAP's perpetuation of phony
"babies can't feel pain" neurology.

NOTE: There is a $400 million dollar per year figure at:
http://www.infocirc.org/MensHlth.htm

Paradoxically, ending the surgery (technically it is a mutilation since
there are no medical benefits) PRESERVES it as a CHOICE American males can
make for themselves in adulthood.

The brazen ongoing medical coverup - babies be damned - is not really so
incredible when one realizes that routine infant circumcision is actually
sexual assault...

In California - far less serious child sexual assault can get **non**-MDs
six years in prison.

Just how serious is the sexual assault euphemistically known as routine
infant circumcision? Following the ripping apart of penile tissue -
following the partial penile amputation - sometimes babies lose their entire
penises or their lives. When a child loses his life because of the crime,
criminal negligence has escalated to criminally negligent homicide.

Routine infant circumcision IS sexual assault/abuse.

In California, *penetration* of a genital orifice is child sexual abuse.
Routine infant circumcision involves penetration and AMPUTATION of a genital
orifice (the preputial niche).

The Carolinas HealthCare System is set up to stop child sexual abuse...

"At the [Carolinas HealthCare] Pediatric Resource Center, children suspected
of being victims of sexual abuse have a clinic dedicated to their needs."
http://www.carolinas.org/services/wo...source_ctr.cfm

"[T]he data the [Carolinas HealthCare] staff collects can help determine if
charges should be filed against an alleged perpetrator..."
http://www.carolinas.org/services/womenchild/

Alanis and Lucidi are promoting child sexual assault by fraudulently
claiming there are "real medical benefits."

I've only seen their abstract, but I suspect their discussion of "the
evolution of circumcision" does not include the fact that the largest state
medical trade union ignored its own Scientific Board and abruptly declared
"an effective public health measure" after exposure of American medicine's
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology. See above.

Since the Carolinas HealthCare Pediatric Resource Center collects data, I
will send this data to them via various persons, including Mark Alanis, MD


CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER ONE OF AMERICA'S BEST HOSPITALS...
"...Carolinas Medical Center has been named by US News & World Report to its
annual edition of America's Best Hospitals...'We are understandably proud of
this national recognition,' said Michael Tarwater, President and CEO of
Carolinas HealthCare System."
http://www.carolinas.org/facilities/...cmc/USNews.cfm

I will copy Carolinas HealthCare System President and CEO MICHAEL TARWATER

via
Polly Baker, RN, MPH
Assistant Vice President
Carolinas HealthCare System
phone: 336-6441
fax: 336-4709


MICHAEL TARWATER: America's best hospitals will want to immediately end
mass child sexual assault by MDs. If you end the mass sexual assault that
is occurring in your hospitals, you will instantly stop mass infant screams
and save America $200 million dollars per year - twice as much if the $400
million dollar per year figure is correct. See URL above.

Michael, as indicated at the Carolinas HealthCare System web site...

The first step in ending the mass child sexual assault is to REPORT it...and
ANY person or institution is required by law to report suspected child
abuse...


BEGIN Carolinas HealthCare System info on child abuse reporting...
Any person or institution who has cause to suspect that a child is being
abused or neglected is required by law to report. If you make a report in
good faith, you will receive immunity from possible civil or criminal
liability that might result from your report. Failure to report suspected
case of child abuse can be punished as a misdemeanor.

Why you should report child abuse

Reporting suspected child abuse can be the first important step in stopping
the abuse and protecting the child from future harm. By reporting, you are
helping the family get services and help that they need. Failing to report
suspected cases of child abuse may result in continuing abuse. Abused
children may carry the trauma associated with the abuse throughout their
entire lives unless treatment, assistance and support are provided.

Because child abuse rarely stops without intervention and help, it is the
law that every citizen report suspected child abuse and neglect. You can
help stop the cycle of abuse by notifying your county Department of Social
Services (DSS), Child Protective Services Division, when you suspect that a
child is being abused or neglected.

Your report can be anonymous. You do not have to give your name when making
a report. If a report is not accepted for investigation, and the reporter
still has concerns, he/she may request a review of the agency's decision by
contacting the agency. If the decision is made by DSS not to file a petition
and the reporter does not agree, he/she can request a review by the district
attorney.

How to make a report

You can make a report of child abuse by calling, writing or visiting your
county Deparmtent of Social Services, the Child Protective Services
Division. The address and phone number can be found in the front of the
local phone book in the county government section, or by calling
800-354-KIDS or 1-919-733-2580.
http://www.carolinas.org/services/wo...childabuse.cfm

END Carolinas HealthCare System info on child abuse reporting...



AN APOLOGY...

One mandated child abuse reporter in Forest Grove, Oregon recently
acknowledged to me that if she so much as SUSPECTS child abuse she is
mandated to report immediately. (She gestured toward her telephone to
indicate that she is required to make an immediate telephone call.)

She was astonished to learn from me that MDs had been saying babies can't
feel pain.

She was further astonished when I informed her that immediately after I
exposed the phony neurology MDs declared their grisly most freqent surgical
behavior toward males "an effective public health measure," etc. (See
above.)

BUT - after learning of the mass child abuse - she told me in effect that,
since we can't stop the war in Iraq - mass child abuse by MDs need not be
reported.

I pointed out that her "war in Iraq" argument is preposterous since babies
NEARBY are being abused - i.e. - babies at nearby hospitals are being tied
to boards and made to scream and writhe and bleed for no medical reason.

She countered by saying (in effect) that the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act/HIPAA would make it impossible to report because of
patient confidentiality.

She indicated that because of HIPAA she can't know which specific infant is
having his penis ripped and sliced - and therefore she cannot report.

Moments later - when confronted - she said that she *hadn't* said that HIPAA
makes it impossible to report the mass child abuse by MDs - so maybe I just
misunderstood her.


NOTE: This mandated child abuse reporter's "war in Iraq" excuse may be
closer to the truth than we know - closer to the truth as to why obvious
mass child abuse is being ignored by law enforcement...

There are global implications...

See Wild circumcision rhetoric of MDs/Israel's history
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2398

And who knows - given the gravity of the obvious MD crimes against mothers
and babies with global implications...

Maybe HIPAA is part of the medical cover-up.

Stranger things...

I frightened this poor woman.

I got angry.

I apologize.

I have been angry for many years. For good reason I think.

She has helped me move on - a truly therapeutic encounter.

I suppose I will always react - as I have done in this post - to
perpetuation of the grisly "potential medical benefits" game being played by
MDs. (See my discussion of Alanis and Lucidi [2004] above.)

But I really do feel like I am moving on - thanks to her - and thanks to the
patience of the woman who brought me to her. Both women finally helped me
understand that I must concede - after so many years - that MDs are above
the law in regard to their mass ripping and slicing of infant penises.

There are some things I won't accomplish in life.

I will always have this HOPE: That the child abuse laws will be used to end
the various MD crimes - or better - that MDs will just stop on their own.

The MD crimes are costing Americans BILLIONS of dollars per year...

Interesting quote from Oregon's Public Employee Benefit Board (PEBB)
website...

"In its current form, habits and environment, American healthcare is
incapable of providing the public with the quality healthcare it deserves"
--Institute of Medicine's Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America
quoted by Oregon's PEBB (PEBB employees listed below)
http://egov.oregon.gov/DAS/PEBB/visionfaq.shtml

PEBB says:

"From member to provider to carrier, the system is broken. PEBB is not
confident that the current marketplace can offer a tangible statewide
solution for the short or long term."

Maybe it's time for the system to stop paying MDs billions of dollars per
year to commit mass child abuse?

Maybe stopping mass child abuse by MDs could become part of PEBB's Vision
for 2007 (part of which is being implemented now)?

I'll copy PEBB via...
Administrator (503) 378-3899
Becky Johnson
Executive Assistant (503) 378-6296
Diana Jones
Project Coordinator (503) 378-3958
Isabel Joslen
Agency Liaison (503) 373-7155
Cheryle Lawrence
Contracts Coordinator (503) 378-8420
Kathy Loretz
Operations Director (503) 373-0800
Barb Merrifield
Benefit Manager (503) 378-3965
Ingrid Norberg
Communications Coordinator (503) 378-4313
Susan Pritt
Financial Coordinator (503) 378-6883
Amy Sanford
Customer Service Coordinator (503) 378-5777
Steve Schafer
Technolgy Project Manager (503) 378-4931
Carol Dolan
Benefits Counselor (503) 378-8413
Kellie Hargis
Benefits Counselor (503) 378-8490
Sandy Johnson
Benefits Counselor (503) 378-8358
Zue Matchett
Benefits Counselor II (503) 378-8423
Sharon Sheehan
Benefits Counselor (503) 378-8031


Back to veterinarian Hillary Israeli, VMD...

Hillary,

MDs do many wonderful medical and surgical things - but they have a LEGAL
MONOPOLY on doing wonderful medical and surgical things - a legal monopoly
they are ABUSING to *grossly* abuse (and sometimes kill) children for
profit.

MDs are NOT "worth their salt" when they abuse babies - and they aren't
worth their salt when they fraudulently promote their vaccinations.

One last matter regarding pediatrician Jeff...

Did you see where pediatrician Jeff said in effect that he can't help stop
obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30% and gruesomely
manipulating most babies' spines - because he is a pediatrician!?

See Breastfeeding news from Sweden (also: Pediatrician 'responds' to
Gastaldo)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2524

As indicated above, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs.

MDs are just academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful
mental meatgrinder.

Pardons in advance will allow MDs to keep doing their valid medical work,
making money to pay the inevitable civil damages.

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS PROOF that OBs and CNMwives are routinely closing birth canals up to
30%...

That semisitting and dorsal close the birth canal is simple biomechanics.

See Gastaldo TD. Letter. Birth 1992;19(4):230.

Here's my source for the 30% figure...

"[T]he outlet increases with moulding by approximately 20-30 per cent."
--Russell JGB. Moulding of the pelvic outlet. J Obstet Gynaec Brit Cwlth
1969;76:817-20.

NOTE: In 1973, Ohlsen verified Russell's 20% figure on
Borell and Fernstrom's 1957 intrapartum x-rays. Ohlsen pointed out that the
authors of Williams Obstetrics were claiming that the pelvic diameters
*don't
change* during delivery (!) - so the authors of Williams Obstetrics decided
(erroneously) that dorsal delivery widens!

Interestingly, J. Whitridge Williams, MD, the original author of Williams
Obstetrics had demonstrated MASSIVE amounts of change in pelvic outlet
diameter change at-term - and the just mentioned 1957 intrapartum x-ray
study accorded with the average amount of pelvic outlet diameter change that
Williams found clinically...

See: http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html

Jason Gardosi, MD, director of the British National Health
Service/NHS West Midlands Perinatal
Institute/WMPI states the grisly biomechanics of the semirecumbent
delivery position (semisitting):

"...the weight of the mother is in part taken on the sacrum which is
therefore pushed upwards, thus decreasing the antero-posterior diameter of
the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm

The funny thing is, Jason Gardosi, MD also *recommends* semisitting (closing
the birth canal) - or used to!

"The second stage...You might want to remain in bed with your back propped
up with pillows...As you push, try to let yourself 'open up' below..."
http://www.preg.info/book/chapter11.htm

NOTE: Jason Gardosi, MD and his fellow British OB pal Malcolm Griffiths once
got me censored from an international OB/GYN listserv - but fortunately not
before two of my posts were archived thereon:
http://forums.obgyn.net/forums/ob-gy...9707/0128.html
http://forums.obgyn.net/ob-gyn-l/OBGYNL.9707/0153.html

Anyone interested in some entertaining obstetric reading, check out Jason's
1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of squatting" - where nobody
squatted...

See Sarah Key's huge balls (also: Kids can SQUAT motionless for hours)...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2084

MORE PROOF According to the Merck Manual:

"When shoulder dystocia occurs...the mother's thighs are hyperflexed to
increase the diameter of the pelvic outlet..."
http://www.merck.com/mrkshared/mmanu...er253/253g.jsp

WHY are OBs and CNMwives (nurse midwives) waiting until the
head is
out and shoulders get stuck before giving the baby maximum pelvic outlet
diameter?

WHY are OBs and CNMwives forcing babies' heads through birth canals
senselessly closed up to 30%?
WHY are OBs and CNMwives KEEPING birth canals closed when babies' shoulders
get stuck?

(Merely hyperflexing the thighs does NOT get the woman off her sacrum. This
is BAD McRoberts maneuver. ON A POSITIVE NOTE: Gardosi et al.'s WMPI site
(quoted above) recommends a version of GOOD McRoberts
if the shoulders get stuck...
http://www.wmpi.net/reviews/oe/oe_shoulder_dystocia.htm)

LADIES: HELP PROTECT YOUR VAGINAS...

OBs and CNMwives are slicing vaginas (euphemism "routine episiotomy") -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring everything possible is being done to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%!

See Criminal medical CAM at Hawai'i's John A Burns School of
Medicine
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2256

Sorry to be repetitive but...

WEIRD: In 1993, the authors of Williams Obstetrics published the correct
biomechanics at my request but they left in their text (in the same
paragraph!) the "dorsal widens" bald lie that first called my attention to
their text.

The "dorsal widens" bald lie was created when Ohlsen informed the authors of
Williams Obstetrics in 1973 that they were still claiming that the pelvic
diameters *don't change* at delivery!

ALSO WEIRD: Before Ohlsen stimulated their "dorsal widens" bald lie, the
authors of Williams Obstetrics were ignoring Borell and Fernstrom's 1957
RADIOGRAPHIC demonstration that the diameters DO change - and this MANY
years after (way back in 1911) J. Whitridge Williams, MD - the first author
of Williams Obstetrics - clinically demonstrated 4cm of AP outlet diameter
change!

For details: See my Open Letter to FTC at:
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html


SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS

PREGNANT WOMEN: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the
"extra" up
to 30%.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on
hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc.

BUT BEWA "Midwives...encourage...semisitting." (closing the birth canal!)
--Yale CNMwifery Prof. Helen Varney. Varney's Midwifery. Sudbury, MA: Jones
and Bartlett. 4th ed. 2004:839]

Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

If your baby's shoulders get stuck OBs and CNMwives will KEEP your birth
canal closed!

Yale CNMwifery Prof. Varney (just cited) writes:

"In the event of...shoulder dystocia...the woman should be
in a lithotomy position..." (p. 839)

Lithotomy position keeps the birth canal closed! So does semisitting!

Talk to your CNMwife or MD or MB about this TODAY. (For further details see
"Criminal medical CAM," URL above.)

CNMwives/MDs/MBs: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - first
get the
woman off her sacrum - off her back/butt.

SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS

PREGNANT WOMEN: It is EASY for you to allow your birth canal to OPEN the
"extra" up
to 30%.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or deliver on
hands-and-knees, kneeling, standing, squatting, etc.

But BEWARE...

Some MDs and MBs will let you "try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

If your baby's shoulders get stuck OBs and CNMwives will KEEP your birth
canal closed!

See above.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


ATTENTION CHIROS...

Copied to Tom Greenway, DC, (U.K.), general secretary Federation
Internationale de Chiropratique du Sport
)

Copied to World Federation of Chiropractic - David Chapman-Smith, WFC
secretary-general
)

David, could you forward this email to every country where WFC has
representation?

Rand Baird, DC, MPH indicated to me that WFC can't simultaneously work on
WHO's Tobacco Free Initiative and work on prevention of birth trauma -
stopping obstetricians from closing birth canals up to 30%...

See Strokes in babies! (also: WFC Pres. Paul F. Carey, DC)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2275

Besides me (Gastaldo), there is another DC (Gottlieb) calling for prevention
of birth trauma...

OBJECTIVE: A review of the medical literature was undertaken to determine
cause, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and prevention of injuries resulting
from birth trauma. The primary focus was the neonate, though infant, child
and adult were also considered because the effects of birth trauma can be
life-long...CONCLUSION: Birth trauma remains an underpublicized and,
therefore, an undertreated problem. There is a need for further
documentation and especially more studies directed toward prevention. In the
meantime, manual treatment of birth trauma injuries to the
neuromusculoskeletal system could be beneficial to many patients not now
receiving such treatment, and it is well within the means of current
practice in chiropractic and manual medicine.
--Gottlieb MS. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Oct;16(8):537-43. PubMed
abstract

Copied to: Marc S. Gottlieb, DC via

North Carolina chiros - Marc's email address may not work - if you know him
please forward this.

Chiros worldwide are missing a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and
tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be
able to adjust by hand.

Incidentally, check out Dorland's new definitions of "vertebral subluxation"
and "straight chiropractic." (!)

See Dorland's: Preventing VS by educating OBs (also: New defn of chiro in
Dorland's)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2318

See also: Vertebral genesis of functional disorders (i.e., dizziness)...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2527


EPISIOTOMY...

I mentioned above that...

OBs are slicing vaginas en masse (euphemism
"routine episiotomy") - surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing
everything possible to OPEN the birth canal - even as they CLOSE the birth
canal - up to 30%.

Michael C. Klein, MD writes: "[E]pisiotomy is a deliberate second degree
tear." [Birth. Letter.
2002;29(1):74]

Episiotomies are usually FRAUDULENT deliberate tears and the fraud isn't
just restricted to MDs fraudulently inferring they are doing everything
possible to open birth canals...

Some MDs are still claiming (fraudulently) that their episiotomies are
*preventing*
severe tears clear to the anus when in fact MDs are CAUSING severe tears
clear to the anus!

In 1990 the National Institutes of Health researched the issue and found
that deliberate tears by
MDs (episiotomies) cause fifty times MORE severe tears (tears clear to the
anus) relative to leaving the vagina alone.[Shiono et al. Obstet Gynecol
1990;75(5):765-70. In Klein et al. Online J Curr Clin Trials
(Jul1)1992, Doc. No. 10]

What happens when MDs cause lots of vaginas to tear?

Well, it hurts a lot - and women can have bladder and anal/rectal
problems... Some women wear diapers for the rest of their lives.

Sometimes the vagina wound gets INFECTED...

Rarely, women lose their vaginas - or rather - much necrosed vulval/vaginal
tissue needs to be removed...

Women are being hospitalized in droves because of the vagina slashing (and
possibly because of the hostile microbial environment where it is
administered):

"The most common diagnosis for hospitalization among all women is trauma to
perineum due to childbirth."
http://www.ahcpr.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm

WHY are we letting MDs do this?!





SEMMELWEIS AND SIDE-LYING...

"Because the midwives delivered women lying on their sides, [Semmelweis]
began to do the same..." [Nuland SB. The Doctors' Plague. NY:WW Norton
2003:93]

Side-lying allows the birth canal to open an "extra" up to 30%!

PREGNANT WOMEN: It's EASY to allow your birth canal OPEN the "extra" up to
30%!

Roll onto your side - or try other "alternative" delivery positions!

BEWARE THOUGH: Some MDs and MBs and midwives (esp. CNMwives) will let you
"try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

Incredibly, MDs KEEP birth canals closed when babies' shoulders get stuck.
See above.

OBs ARE MAKING BIRTH A HIGH RISK SCENARIO...

"There were 6,743 deliveries at Carolinas Medical Center during the academic
year 2002-2003..."
http://www.carolinas.org/education/meded/obgyn/

Robert A. Bitterman, MD, JD recently told the North Carolina House Blue
Ribbon Task Force on Medical Malpractice (Feb. 10, 2004):


"Obstetrician/gynecologist physicians have dropped privileges to deliver
babies, so they no longer have to take care of those high risk scenarios."
http://www.nccep.org/content/article...onyFeb1004.doc

ATTORNEY DR. ROBERT! Obstetricians are NEEDLESSLY increasing birth risk -
KNOWINGLY closing birth canals up to 30% and KEEPING birth canals closed
when shoulders get stuck.

Copied to Robert A. Bitterman, MD, JD FACEP at Department of Emergency
Medicine at the Carolinas Medical Center, 704-355-5291 via




PREGNANT WOMEN: It's EASY to allow your birth canal OPEN the "extra" up to
30%!

Roll onto your side - or try other "alternative" delivery positions!

BEWARE THOUGH: Some MDs and MBs and midwives (esp. CNMwives) will let you
"try" "alternative"
delivery positions but will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close
your birth canal!) as you push your baby out!

WORSE: MDs and MBs routinely pull with forceps and vacuums with birth
canals senselessly closed!

Sometimes MDs and MBs pull so hard that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny
spinal cords!

North Carolina chiros - and Robert A. Bitterman, MD, JD - please help stop
this grisly obstetric tomfoolery. Please immediately report it as child
abuse.

"Any person or institution who has cause to suspect that a child is being
abused or neglected is required by law to report."
http://www.carolinas.org/services/wo...childabuse.cfm

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo